sanitation@lemmy.radio to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 days agoJames Cameron and Walt Disney Company Sued Over Unauthorized Use of Actress’ Likeness in ‘Avatar’variety.comexternal-linkmessage-square25linkfedilinkarrow-up1118arrow-down10
arrow-up1118arrow-down1external-linkJames Cameron and Walt Disney Company Sued Over Unauthorized Use of Actress’ Likeness in ‘Avatar’variety.comsanitation@lemmy.radio to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 days agomessage-square25linkfedilink
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·19 days agoSeems pretty freaking important, given how residuals work?
minus-squareMacAnus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·19 days agoYes that changes the amount of money she would get, but I meant how important is it in regards to her rights being abused?
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·19 days agoSeems pretty important to me.
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·19 days agoMore money made means more people saw it?
minus-squareMacAnus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 days agoAh yeah that makes sense. Thanks
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·19 days agoThe economic angle is already obvious, but even if we leave that aside: the more people see a film, the more people will see her likeness used without her consent.
Seems pretty freaking important, given how residuals work?
Yes that changes the amount of money she would get, but I meant how important is it in regards to her rights being abused?
Seems pretty important to me.
How so ?
More money made means more people saw it?
Ah yeah that makes sense. Thanks
The economic angle is already obvious, but even if we leave that aside: the more people see a film, the more people will see her likeness used without her consent.