Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 年前Please discuss.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square140linkfedilinkarrow-up11.07Karrow-down131
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1imagePlease discuss.lemmy.mlMarxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 年前message-square140linkfedilink
minus-squareoctoperson@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 年前I’m pretty sure it counts as a sandwich as defined by the ham sandwich theorem. The only part that might be debatable is that the filling is not a single connected volume, but that doesn’t seem to be required by the proof.
I’m pretty sure it counts as a sandwich as defined by the ham sandwich theorem. The only part that might be debatable is that the filling is not a single connected volume, but that doesn’t seem to be required by the proof.