Pretty cheesy of you to think I do not know what Firebase is. You should know better, then, what Firebase does, and that its implementation and calls are transparent and can be inspected too?
Why do you not inspect the intents and calls made to Firebase, since Signal is open source? If you can prove it, feel free to generate valid criticism instead of taking blindfolded shots.
This post is not valid criticism of Signal, as much as I have felt spited by Cloudflare use in Signal.
Your comment includes no proper answer and no content, only an ad hominem. If you make a claim, the burden of proof is on your side of the argument, not on the responders’.
Services, providers and receivers != trackers
It’s Google we’re talking about here. Nuff’ said.
I do not think it is a good idea for you to talk about software without knowing how it works.
Oh, I know what Google Firebase are. Maybe you don’t know what Firebase are?
https://medium.com/firebase-developers/what-is-firebase-the-complete-story-abridged-bcc730c5f2c0
Like I said, it is Google we’re talking about here. Nuff’ said.
Pretty cheesy of you to think I do not know what Firebase is. You should know better, then, what Firebase does, and that its implementation and calls are transparent and can be inspected too?
Criticism goes like Genuine>none>blind
If Signal now are fully E2EE where nothing is logged, not even metadatas, then why do Signal use Firebase?
Why do you not inspect the intents and calls made to Firebase, since Signal is open source? If you can prove it, feel free to generate valid criticism instead of taking blindfolded shots.
This post is not valid criticism of Signal, as much as I have felt spited by Cloudflare use in Signal.
I can’t since I am only a web programmer. Instead, I gather information from valid sources and listen to what other people say.
So OP did not even mention trackers, yet label post as trackers, and take it as valid source? This is called confirmation bias engagement. :)
Your comment includes no proper answer and no content, only an ad hominem. If you make a claim, the burden of proof is on your side of the argument, not on the responders’.
The burden of claim initially was on OP, not me. I am still the responder technically.
well then, we should wait for a good explanation ;)
OP did not affirm anything in his reply to his post. Enjoy the confusion lol