matcha_addict@lemy.lol to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoIf you only criticize civilian casualties when Palestine resists, then your concern isn't civilian casualties. Your concern is Palestine resisting massacre.lemy.lolimagemessage-square342fedilinkarrow-up11.37Karrow-down1395file-text
arrow-up1977arrow-down1imageIf you only criticize civilian casualties when Palestine resists, then your concern isn't civilian casualties. Your concern is Palestine resisting massacre.lemy.lolmatcha_addict@lemy.lol to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square342fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFaceDeer@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up56arrow-down11·1 year agoIt’s possible for both sides of a conflict to suck.
minus-squarematcha_addict@lemy.lolOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down36·edit-21 year agoIt is possible. But in this case, it is occupier vs occupied. An ethnoreligious state vs stateless people being ethnically cleansed. Something being possible doesn’t make it factual.
minus-squareciko22i3@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down18·1 year agoLife is not a Marvel movie
minus-squareciko22i3@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down14·edit-21 year agoI’m not parsing people parading around with corpses for their “resistance ✊” just because they would make a good “opressed good guy” in a movie
minus-squarematcha_addict@lemy.lolOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down20·1 year agoIs there a coherent argument here for me to respond to? If so, state it clearly and directly. Your movie analogy makes no sense.
minus-squareciko22i3@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down11·1 year agoI don’t see how i can make my comments any more clear unless i draw little pictures on a piece of paper. You’re not too sharp, are you?
minus-squarematcha_addict@lemy.lolOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down14·1 year agoI take it you don’t understand what “directly” means. Not surprising.
minus-squareciko22i3@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·1 year agoHere you go buddy, hope this makes it clearer. I understand its hard for you when things arent presented in cute little pictures.
minus-squarematcha_addict@lemy.lolOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·1 year agoYou didn’t have to draw anything to let me know that you can’t state your argument directly. I already suspected.
It’s possible for both sides of a conflict to suck.
It is possible. But in this case, it is occupier vs occupied. An ethnoreligious state vs stateless people being ethnically cleansed. Something being possible doesn’t make it factual.
Life is not a Marvel movie
Then act like it
I’m not parsing people parading around with corpses for their “resistance ✊” just because they would make a good “opressed good guy” in a movie
Is there a coherent argument here for me to respond to? If so, state it clearly and directly. Your movie analogy makes no sense.
I don’t see how i can make my comments any more clear unless i draw little pictures on a piece of paper. You’re not too sharp, are you?
I take it you don’t understand what “directly” means. Not surprising.
Here you go buddy, hope this makes it clearer. I understand its hard for you when things arent presented in cute little pictures.
You didn’t have to draw anything to let me know that you can’t state your argument directly. I already suspected.