The Hamas-run Health Ministry in the Gaza Strip says at least 500 people have been killed in an explosion that it says was caused by an Israeli airstrike.
Updated: Israel denies involvement in deadly Gaza hospital blast, says explosion caused by Islamic Jihad
Thus far your contributions to this “debate” have been “that’s bs”, “gimme source”, “i don’t like your source”, and “you’re arguing wrong”.
You’re just being a shit-stirrer right now. Are you seriously going to pretend you’ve been having a rational discussion this whole time? If the only acceptable endgame for you is the other person blindly accepting your contrary viewpoint, with NO sources might I add, then you’re arguing in bad faith.
That’s not a debate, at best it’s a pisspoor attempt at a lecture.
edit: cool job ninja editing your comments to make you look slightly less bad.
What do you expect? I get one toe into a discussion and get unjustly lambasted with names and labels. You went through my comment history, from other interactions, to assemble what you think was a complete debate. You’re scraping the barrel and you’re a malicious coward if you want to get into name-calling.
Address the precision of the strike. Address vaguery of Biden’s affirmation. Address the context of the IJ call. Can you? Or do you attack the debater themselves, you ad-hominem prone dunce?
Edit: I can’t even recall what I edited. You can repost it if you like, since you’re grasping at straws.
edit: cool job ninja editing your comments to make you look slightly less bad.
Not choosing sides in your argument, but just saying, that’s why you always quote what you’re replying to, to protect your reply from future edits of the original comment.
Thus far your contributions to this “debate” have been “that’s bs”, “gimme source”, “i don’t like your source”, and “you’re arguing wrong”.
You’re just being a shit-stirrer right now. Are you seriously going to pretend you’ve been having a rational discussion this whole time? If the only acceptable endgame for you is the other person blindly accepting your contrary viewpoint, with NO sources might I add, then you’re arguing in bad faith.
That’s not a debate, at best it’s a pisspoor attempt at a lecture.
edit: cool job ninja editing your comments to make you look slightly less bad.
What do you expect? I get one toe into a discussion and get unjustly lambasted with names and labels. You went through my comment history, from other interactions, to assemble what you think was a complete debate. You’re scraping the barrel and you’re a malicious coward if you want to get into name-calling.
Address the precision of the strike. Address vaguery of Biden’s affirmation. Address the context of the IJ call. Can you? Or do you attack the debater themselves, you ad-hominem prone dunce?
Edit: I can’t even recall what I edited. You can repost it if you like, since you’re grasping at straws.
Not choosing sides in your argument, but just saying, that’s why you always quote what you’re replying to, to protect your reply from future edits of the original comment.