• Gwynne@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 years ago

      exactly like it says. encrypted by default, more control over what posts federate and maybe an unfederated (encrypted) account until accepted a follow request. which some need for a friends-only instance. or a family only one.

      • torresjrjr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Doesn’t what you descript already exist? Mastodon does all of this.

        Besides, the Fediverse and ActivityPub is particularly a social network. It’s basically a web of json-ld documents. I expect my posts and data to federate across the entire network for the Fediverse to see, as long as I set my audience to such per post. This is already way better than Facebook, for example, which actively non-consensually scans my phone for contacts, tracks my location 24/7, etc.

        Usually, people asking for privacy on social networks confuse privacy with anonymity or pseudonymity, which is an actual problem. Is this what you mean?

        • Gwynne@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Maybe more options can help like diaspora but yes I’m particularly talking about privacy. not anonymity.

          the privacy options specifically what I meant is choosing which group of people to see which posts. while others can’t see it. this can help for people who want to just run one account to post things on seperate groups without using a “second” private account for friends.