• rivermonster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I get that. Hell they shouldn’t have Hamas using them as shields either just bc they elected Hamas. I get it.

    But “shouldn’t have to” and reality are clashing. And if the option is refugee or civilian deaths then I’d rather they lived.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be mathematically impossible for them to have elected Hamas since 50% of them are 18 and younger, and the last election was held over 17 years ago.

      • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the reason the last election was held so long ago was that after Hamas won elections in Gaza, the west supported a coup that failed and entrenched Hamas in power.

      • rivermonster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d debate that with you, but it distracts from the point. Civilians need a path to refuge and not be forced to stay in rhe Hamas/Israeli warzone.

        If they want to stay, go for it. But lots of people who don’t want to see their families die, have no way out by design and to the delight of both Hamas and Netanyahu.