Hamas’ brutal attacks in Israel on October 7 killed at least 1,400 people and the group took more than 200 hostages, according to Israeli authorities. In the wake of the assault, Israel launched an aerial bombardment of Gaza that Palestinian health officials say has killed more than 5,000 people. Israel also announced a “complete siege” on the enclave, withholding vital supplies of water, food and fuel.

  • rbn@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That doesn’t sound a lot tbh… If you calculate with 2M people there, it’s just 0.25 litres per person. I don’t think that would be sufficient to filter vast amounts of water.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, why haven’t the fuel tanks been destroyed in the strategic military focused air bombings? Obviously they’ve been identified so that they can be reported on

      • no step on snek@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, they just managed to get a good look at fuel tanks (but no information about the content)… and yet when they bomb “terrorists” in Gaza with heir super x-ray vision, they still manage to kill 40% children.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think this is simply a function of the asymmetry of the military forces involved. The Israeli military has full control of the air, long range artillery, modern western weapons. They can destroy any target they want easily.

          Therefore any installation Hamas has that’s separated from the population, will have already been destroyed in the early phases of the conflict 20 years ago. Anything they build that’s away from population centers would be immediately destroyed.

          Perhaps it’s an unintended consequence but the emerging behavior is the only military installations that survive are near civilian populations. It doesn’t help that the population density of the conflict area is incredibly high, with the majority of the population being children. Meaning there’s children everywhere around every target. Because any target that’s not around children would have been destroyed already.

          And none of this has to do with the intentions of either side, it’s just the asymmetric capabilities creating de facto emergent behavior. It’s not that Hamas is trying to use human shields, they have no other practical choice. And before the exasperated brigade starts to dogpile me, this is just the reality of war, it’s not an apology.

          • no step on snek@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            it’s just the asymmetric capabilities creating de facto emergent behavior

            Yes, but you still need someone to pull the trigger, and then you need 10 other nations to say “it’s the right to self defense” to make it okay.

            It’s might + intent, not one without the other.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Because the government of Israel has asymmetric strength in this conflict, it makes them more responsible to move towards peace. Simply because they have most of the capabilities.

              Blaming Hamas is completely valid, Hamas is a bad actor.

              Blaming the Palestinian people is not valid, Israel the country with its asymmetric capabilities is the responsible one to bring the populations towards peace.

              As the last 60 years of demonstrated, using your asymmetric power to just bomb a population into submission, might buy you a respite, but does not end the cycle of violence

              • no step on snek@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                but does not end the cycle of violence

                Yep, and honestly I keep wondering what Israel was thinking. Did it think it could keep Palestinians from retaliating forever?

                What was the plan for Gaza anyway? Leaving that bomb ticking rather than removing the siege (gradually at least) and allowing these people self-determination.

                • mwguy@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I believe there said they’ll stop the siege if the hostages are released.

                  • no step on snek@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ah yes as if they have the right to make conditions about people’s lives.

                    The hostages are being freed one by one. Let’s see if Israel stops genocidin’ when the hostages have been released.

                    My bet is that it will not.

      • mwguy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably the location. A fuel depot would cause secondary explosions, and a large one. Israel attempts to mitigate damage to Innocents with its air strikes.

    • probablyaCat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Counting it towards to number of people is a little silly. Checking how long a generator can run off of a liter of fuel makes much more sense.

      On top of that, not only are they hoarding, but they are also stealing what comes in.

      • rbn@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I quickly googled some numbers, so no guarantee for 100% correctness.

        Desalination uses about 3.6kWh/m3 of water. A generator can produce around 1.5kWh/litre of fuel. 500,000 litres of fuel would result in 750,000 kWh. 750,000 kWh would result in 208,333 m3 or 208,333,000 litres of water. That theoretically would allow you to create around 200 litres per person if you use the entire amount of fuel on water desalination.

        But this calculation only works in a hypothetical scenario and not in a real life scenario. Distribution of the water to all the people will require a lot of energy as well, e.g. for tank trucks. And I think in an active war zone you probably won’t find world class logistics.

        Furthermore, you also need fuel and electricity for other critical infrastructure: firetrucks, hospitals, phones, cooking, …