• DarkGamer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Vague. Does that mean, let them keep launching attacks against your civilians from behind human shields, or send in ground forces expecting wildly massive casualties?

      • NotBillMurray@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        At its root it’s actually pretty simple. If it involves killing children, do not do it. If you’d like we can get into the more in depth discussion of slowly forcing more and more people into a terrible situation and how that drives them into the arms of Hamas, but at its root, don’t shoot kids.

        • DarkGamer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Given that one cannot see the future, there’s always a chance of collateral damage with any military action, and a decent chance it will be a child in Gaza where the inhabitants decided to have a lot of them, it sounds like you’ve ruled out any sort of reprisal. Let them slaughter your civilians with impunity, then? Great plan.