• seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, yes and no. The Democrat Party is structured to prevent takeovers like what happened to the GOP (e.g. super-delegates). I think it is moving to the left, but glacially slowly. 20 years ago, somebody like Bernie would have been a joke. Now, he’s a viable contender. Maybe in another 50 or 60 years, they’ll be where European leftist parties are now.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        super-delegates

        Super-delegates had the their role in the nomination massively reduced, with no role whatsoever in the first round of voting. Bernie is not a viable contender at the moment because he represents only the left flank of the party. He’s also toxic in the general election. Praising Castro and honeymooning in the USSR just aren’t great things to have on a president’s resume.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or, and here’s a wild idea, you can vote in the coming election. The entire House and a third of the Senate changes hands every two years. The GOPs vote in every single election. That’s the absolute least we should be doing. Pushing for more Squad members starts in your town.

        https://youtu.be/t0e9guhV35o

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m shocked - SHOCKED - that a quick meme isn’t an exact representation of a much longer document.

    • Zehzin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I sincerely doubt they’ll change past what their owners allow them to. Maybe that’s a step towards actual change but it’s certainly not enough by itself.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Politicians do what it takes to get elected. Period.

        What part of that confuses you?

        Nelson Rockefeller was one of the richest men in America. He thought he was a shoo-in to be the GOP candidate in 1968. Nixon had no big backers and was seen as a loser by the media.

        Except Nixon had spent all his time after his California Sneate race loss working 24/7 for every GOP candidate he could find. He made speeches, raised money, helped organize, and when he went into the 1968 convention, he ran rings around what the establishment wanted.

        Money is huge in politics, but organization can beat it.

        • Zehzin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So you’re telling me with enough organization within the system we can swap a piece of shit for a piece of shit? Sign me tf up

            • Zehzin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Don’t put words in my mouth. If what you took from the last however many comments is that I’m saying “voting useless”, I don’t think you’re qualified to have this conversation in the first place.

              But to answer your question, they will bend whatever laws they have to to keep themselves in power. I don’t know why you thought that showing an example of how fucked the US voting system is is a point in favor of it.