• beefpeach@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would say I know the basics of Linux due to owning a Pi and messing around with it time-to-time but no where near experienced.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      TL; DR: From personal experience as a Raspberry Pi tinkerer and Windows evacuee, I recommend Linux Mint.

      Raspberry Pi OS is essentially Debian compiled for ARM with the LXDE desktop. They used to use LXDE, and it is my understanding they forked LXDE to make their “Pixel” desktop. Being Debian, it uses the APT package manager with .deb packages.

      Linux Mint is a fork of Ubuntu, which itself is a fork of Debian. It uses the APT package manager and .deb packages. The exact same commands to install, say, LibreOffice on a Raspberry Pi can be used to install it on Linux Mint.

      Cinnamon is the flagship desktop, and I think is a reasonable answer to “What if Microsoft had kept developing the Windows 7 desktop instead of trying to make a tablet OS?” I chose Cinnamon pretty immediately because it felt more like the Windows I had grown up with than Windows 8.1 did.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is: Linux Mint Debian Edition. There are a few things you’re missing in LMDE than in the standard Ubuntu-based version though, such as the driver manager and support for PPAs. The latter of which has declined in usefulness with the rise of Flatpaks, I haven’t installed from a PPA in years now.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Decide on a DE you want and do a Debian net install. You’ll get to pick which one you want and then the installer will get all the latest packages and you’ll be up-to-date on first reboot.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        and Ubuntu

        No. It’s way too complicated to circumvent Canonical’s attempts at vendor lock-in. One might just as well pick a more open distribution from the beginning.

        • cole@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          most users simply do not care. if it works, it works

          • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Why subject them to snaps if they dont have to be? It’s not that much different between Debian and Ubuntu Debian is WAY more bloat-free than Ubuntu.