• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      126
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is the “ad”. Personally, I don’t think a little plug like this is worth any kind of fuss. If it were a real ad or something, then yea I would get it.

      • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        125
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        An ad is an ad and this definitely is an ad. This is the kind of shit that made me quit Windows and it would make me quit Ubuntu if I was using it.

        • folkrav@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          61
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This. Any unsollicited communication that’s meant to make you investigate or buy a commercial product is an advertisement. That’s all. Is it less intrusive than the TikTok ad in Windows start menu, I think it may be, but it’s still an advertisement, by definition.

          • _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is it less intrusive

            For me it is, I would’ve never ever expected an ad on cli, on a local install, on my machine.

            Logged into an ec2 and see an advert? Sure. But not on my own shit. It’s a true “ah fuck I can’t believe you’ve done this” factor.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ubuntu Pro seems to be free for regular users (on up to five machines).

            Would bother me a lot more if it wasn’t a free service. Now it’s ehh

            • folkrav@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              As I mentioned in another comment, it’s still a commercial offering, that happens to have a free tier. Would we be okay with a YouTube link in the same spot?

              Honestly, it doesn’t bother me that much. It’s more that you can see a more and more corporate-y trend in Canonical’s decision making, which I personally don’t really care for. If I used Ubuntu with the default shell I’d probably just override the MOTD and go on with my life.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Would we be okay with a YouTube link in the same spot?

                Like, promoting Youtube or just a link to a Youtube video promoting Ubuntu Pro or what do you mean?

                • folkrav@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  A link promoting any other commercial product with a free tier. Like AWS, or YouTube.

                  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I wouldn’t be really bothered if Google promoted Youtube in their product. I’d expect it, really.

        • Virtual Insanity @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think this is the best take. This alone if it went nowhere is fairly harmless.

          But I think we know what it really is, is the start of a slippery slope.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Different strokes and all that. I’m personally ok with the way this is done, but I can also see why people wouldn’t like it at all

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I use Ubuntu and I haven’t seen ads in the terminal.

            But I see everyone complaining about them.

            What am I missing here?

          • batmaniam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m newer to linux, and kind of a moron, but I 1) bounced off Ubuntu and 2) haven’t seen this crap with Debian.

      • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I’m not bothered by this in particular, like other people have said, it feels like the top of a very slippery slope that I would be bothered by

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s pretty much how I feel about it. This specific method is alright by me, but it could very easily become something intrusive.

          • macniel@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think that’s from a server but instead it’s baked into apt. Or some post-install trigger.

      • aberrate_junior_beatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve been getting ads like these for years on my ubuntu server.

        n additional security updates can be applied with ESM Apps.
        Learn more about enabling ESM Apps service at https://ubuntu.com/esm
        

        This is on a machine running 20.04. Never bothered me. All my other machines are Debian now, and at some point I’ll switch that one too.

      • daftwerder@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        this plus the snap crap they’ve been doing was enough for me to switch to Debian

      • galmuth@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, this isn’t that bad. It’s just a suggestion after running an apt upgrade. NPM has similar plugs which I don’t find too annoying.

        In fact its not even as intrusive as NPM’s funding requests, as it is only 2 lines of text, plus it looks like Ubuntu Pro is free for personal use.

      • Grabbels@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see a lot of people comment that this isn’t that bad and that it might even be acceptable, and that’s exactly the problem here: it’s a gateway drug and if we normalise this, Canonical will keep pushing the limits of what they can pull off before it’s not acceptable anymore, and that sounds when it’s too late.

    • SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Haven’t kept up with Ubuntu, but I believe this. It’s in line with Canonical’s behavior. They are very corporaty

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Kind of, they have announcements in the terminal sometimes and telemetry wont go out unless you confirm you want it to. I personally have it disabled, but its not invasive.