Stolen from linuxmemes at deltachat

  • m_r_butts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think this is funny, but it’s hard for me to hate too much on flatpaks. Disk space is practically free now, and having spent a good chunk of my career fighting DLL hell, I have a lot of sympathy for the problem it’s trying to solve.

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I mean it’s taking 500G of my terrabyte ssd. What else was I going to use that for? Installing games off steam? Two node modules folders?

    • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its good and bad. Bad because the base system cant use it and its not the main packaging choice.

      Lots of good apps like OBS use outdated runtimes, which simply should not be used anymore. I am not sure if this is a security issue but probably it is, and it creates this unnecessary Runtime bloat.

    • AlexJD@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly this. It’s so nice to not have to hunt for a specific library that depends on 20 other libraries. I’d rather pay in disk space than deal with that.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hate this philosophy so much! I hate developers for it! It’s like they gave up on even trying to do anything about retrocompatibility and managing libraries and dependancies.

      Anyway it will collapse soon. I just wish it was sooner.

      • catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly I get both sides of it. Your view makes sense as an end-user and from a philosophical perspective. But some people have legacy software that needs conflicting dependency versions, for instance. It’s just a trade-off.

      • Synthead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, package maintainers should have their dependencies figured out. “Managing dependencies is too hard” is a distro packager’s problem to figure out, and isn’t a user problem. When they solve it and give you a package, you don’t need to figure it out anymore.

        Plus, frequent breaking changes in library APIs is a big no-no, so this is avoided whenever possible by responsible authors. Additionally, authors relying on libs with shitty practices is also a no-no. But again, you don’t need to worry about dependences because your packager figured this out, included the correct files with working links, and gave them to you as a solved problem.

    • Seven@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some people have limited bandwidth for downloads, and a simple program can run to more space than a basic distro.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s trying to solve.

      It does not solve it. It just slaps more DLLs on top. Package managers do.