Two ballistic missiles were fired from Houthi rebel-controlled Yemen toward a US warship in the Gulf of Aden, after the US Navy responded to a distress call from a commercial tanker that had been seized by armed individuals, the US military said Sunday.

The tanker, identified as the Central Park, had been carrying a cargo of phosphoric acid when its crew called for help that “they were under attack from an unknown entity,” the US Central Command said in a statement.

The USS Mason, a guided-missile destroyer, and allied ships from a counter-piracy task force that operates in the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia responded to the call for help and “demanded release of the vessel” upon arrival, Central Command said.

“Subsequently, five armed individuals debarked the ship and attempted to flee via their small boat,” said the statement posted on social media platform X.

  • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Aww it’s the USS Liberty sequel!

    Israel loves pulling the US into war. It’s their national pisstime.

    Edit: corrected the word passtime

    • HamSwagwich@showeq.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      “Pastime”

      “Passtime” is both not a word and if it were it would mean something not what you are attending.

      While we are at it,

      It’s “Dog-eat-dog” not “doggy-dog” “Regardless” not “irregardless”

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I wonder if conservatives are gonna run with this story and make the Houthis the next Supervillain Of The Month, or just slap the “rebel” tag on them and forget about it.

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well conservative have no idea what is going on. If they say the Houthi are bad then they cannot complain about Obama bombing them. If they say the are not bad, then Israil will be upset.

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You or I would take those things into account, but remember: conservatives are extremely comfortable with hypocrisy.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        don’t forget about the border crisis up north.

        did you hear about the massive terrorist attack on the northern border that wasnt totally just a sad, and tragic car accident?

        • Mirshe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          But it exploded! You know, like vehicles filled with large amounts of volatile fluids can do under the precise circumstances. It’s really really rare, but it absolutely CAN happen if the right things happen.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The Houthis are an Iranian proxy. The smart conservatives will know this and will incorporate it into their vilification efforts. The stupid ones don’t need anything like a reason or a plausible excuse.

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Before anyone makes the obvious joke, it’s important to remember that yes, there ARE smart conservatives. Folks like me are used to making fun of MAGAts and their ilk, but don’t underestimate the conservatives higher up.

    • vivadanang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      the high angle of attack reduces opportunity for intercept by all but the most advanced and expensive systems. it may seem counterintuitive, but we’re not dealing with 1960s ballistic missiles, we can now guide during terminal descent.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        From the description though it seems like these ballistic missiles were about as technologically advanced as a firework.

        • vivadanang@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          yeah I have no doubt iran /whomever has a long long way to go in their development, just don’t want to see all ballistics derided because they change the intercept game mightily.

      • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        (Good) Terminal guidance really puts a limit on the speed though, which kind of negates the main advantage of using a ballistic missile (speed).

        Even a good ballistic missile will be open for interception longer than say a low observability sea skimmer like LARASM.

  • UFODivebomb@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    “The missiles landed in the Gulf of Aden approximately ten nautical miles from the ships,"

    Yeah… Not concerned at all.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Two ballistic missiles were fired from Houthi rebel-controlled Yemen toward a US warship in the Gulf of Aden, after the US Navy responded to a distress call from a commercial tanker that had been seized by armed individuals, the US military said Sunday.

    The USS Mason, a guided-missile destroyer, and allied ships from a counter-piracy task force that operates in the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia responded to the call for help and “demanded release of the vessel” upon arrival, Central Command said.

    “Subsequently, five armed individuals debarked the ship and attempted to flee via their small boat,” said the statement posted on social media platform X.

    Hours later, at 1:41 a.m. local time on Monday morning, two ballistic missiles were fired from areas controlled by Houthi rebels in Yemen “toward the general location” of the USS Mason and Central Park, the statement said.

    A statement from Zodiac Maritime, which manages the Central Park, said Sunday the Liberian-flagged chemical tanker was safe “and all of the crew, the vessel, and cargo are unharmed.”

    “We will continue to work with allies and partners to ensure the safety and security of international shipping lanes,” Kurilla said.


    The original article contains 378 words, the summary contains 198 words. Saved 48%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • lps2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is about Saudi Arabia and Iran’s proxy war in Yemen, not Israel

    • roguetrick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      The Houthi hate the US for reasons other than Israel. They kind of view us as at the same level of Israel.

      • shiroininja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well we have been selling arms to the Saudis for a proxy war that by now has led to the starvation death of children numbered at almost 100,000. Atleast it was around 70,000 a few years ago. So it must be more now

      • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, death to America on their flag and all that. I’m talking about US presence in the sea.

        • cooljacob204@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The US navy combats piracy world wide. The destroyer’s response has nothing to do with it being an Israeli tanker.

    • brianorca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The US would have responded the same for a large number of different counties’ ship if they were hijacked in a similar way.