Hello everyone,

Books are still one of the most important sources of information we have as a human species. However, the media on which this information has been stored has changed considerably over time and with it its accessibility and influence on our society.

Nowadays you can find an enormous range of books and texts online. Most of the time, however, access to them is extremely fragmented, difficult to find, subject to a fee, incompatible with the software platform of your choice or, in the worst case, goes under with its provider over time.

To counteract this, annas-archive was founded to make the knowledge stored in the texts and books openly accessible and to preserve it for future generations. On the other hand, there are platforms such as Goodreads that aim to simplify the joy of reading and the exchange of information, as well as the review and discussion of books and texts.

Unfortunately, Goodreads is a centralized, proprietary solution that in addition also happens to be owned by Amazon. BookWyrm is a decentralized, open source alternative in the fediverse that steps in right here.

Now here’s the kicker: what if we combined the power of both platforms? What if we combined the enormous book database of annas-archive with the fediverse, i.e. BookWyrm? Annas archive could benefit from reviews and discussions about the books and BookWyrm could expand its still very limited database many times over.

From my point of view, this would be the perfect combination of two already great projects. What do you think?


TL:DR What do you think about combining annas-archive with the fediverse (BookWyrm)

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Isn’t Anna’s Library piracy? Bookwyrm is just a book tracker ala goodreads which only has metadata, providing links to free downloads of books is illegal and would put them under fire.

    If you want a legal alternative to what you’re describing, check out OpenLibrary. You can borrow books there and use it as a Goodreads alternative.

    • PropaGandalf@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Anna’s Archive is way more than just a redirection to sources where you can get the books for free. In that sense the content itself is hosted on different platforms like IPFS, through torrents or on zlibrary and AA is just a discovery, curatorial platform. But Thanks for the info about OpenLibrary!

      • Star@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        AA is just a discovery, curatorial platform.

        It isn’t just a discovery/search platform anymore. Source

  • Fluid@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Anything that helps bookwyrm grow its knowledge library of books (missing a LOT of books that goodreads has) is a good idea. I fear however that combining anything which points people to where to pirate the book might not help the popularity/reputation of bookwyrm as a good OS alt to goodreads.

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    I mean, yea. The whole point of this project is to replace traditional internet services with updated and improved ones.

    So, we should probably do that. It’s not a question of the ideas being good or not, though, it’s how there’s not enough people to do all the sitting down and physically working to create these things. So, progress is slow. Just because there’s not that many of us yet, in the grand scheme of things. Especially compared to the scope of the Fediverse’s ambitions.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Very true. The success of BookWyrm makes me hungry for other variations covering a range of stuff but the pool of talent isn’t massive and they all seem to be busy on various projects.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    With Anna’s Archive there’d be issues of the legality of linking to it but BookWyrm does provide OpenLibrary links where available.

    Ultimately, someone could create a more piracy focused fork of BookWyrm and start their own instance but I think it would be problematic for the core project to bake it in and open anyone running an instance up to legal issues. I suppose there’s nothing stopping Anna’s Archive from doing it to provide a more social interface to their database.

  • Jay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Oh wow, they even have the book that was written about my great, great, great grandparents.

    I’ve already bought the actual book but it’s nice to have a pdf of it as well.

  • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Never heard of Anna’s Archive before. Not sure how I feel about the prospect of piracy in the fediverse explicitly.

    • maxprime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, that’s the cool thing about federation. Some instances could adopt this and some could reject it.

      • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Illegalities are a boon for everything they need. They push and accelerate development and that’s never a bad thing. But the flipside of that is the negative stigma. It would be wonderful to have Anna’s Archive without it being a thing for that reason. We always want the growth of the Fediverse and a giant project like Anna’s Archive may be what we need to inspire more projects to join until such a point that there’s a counterbalance to mastodon.