Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

  • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Comment stolen from user “copygirl” from blahaj.zone:

    Looks like they’ll be harvesting your data if you follow anyone from Threads, maybe even injecting ads. Unsure what happens to the data of people that get followed by a Threads user. A large part of the fediverse is here precisely because they want to escape corporate meddling, data-hoarding, advertising and other anti-user malpractices. There’s a number of people talking about this, here’s a recent post that highlights some of the things from their TOS.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not as if something was preventing them from

      data-hoarding

      and

      harvesting your data

      here anyway.

      So that part about being followed by a Threads user is just a bit stupid.

      The danger is in them becoming an integral part of the network where people don’t bother to register at a normal instance, and then Meta pulling out and the network remaining half-dead.

    • chriscz@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Anyone can collect the data anyway, and I’m sure at least one person out there is already harvesting our Fediverse data.

    • misophist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Is there any sort of legal precedent that covers a situation where:

      • I am a user on a network server.
      • Meta connects their server to my server so their users and I can interact.
      • Am I now bound by a terms of service on Meta’s server that I have not agreed to and may have never seen or been presented with?

      When I joint my instance, am I implicitly agreeing to any terms of service that exist on any instance that my instance decides to federate with?#

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lemmy and mastodon profiles are public so I don’t know if privacy concerns are a problem unique to federation with meta considering they could just scrape your profile if they wanted the data that bad. I’d be much more concerned about small instance admins losing funding as users migrate to instances that federate with meta until threads and the big instances are the only ones left on the fediverse