I used to think that there would be 1, main ‘Fediverse’ with all of the ‘big instances’ connected to each other. The recent Threads debacle has shown me otherwise.

The point of the Fediverse is that there is no one single entity, or group of entities, dominating it all.

Right now it feels like whatever the big instances do, we kind of have to go along with to be a part of anything. As the Fediverse grows, there will be more options to suit different types of users.

I think it’s fine if big instances federate with Threads and it’s fine if they don’t. People can just join instances that align with what they want. It’s not like defederating means being cut out of the Fediverse, that’s not possible.

Great design. I’m eager to see how it plays out.

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    User side blocking will hide the communities but not the comments from others.

    On the other hand, interacting with Lemmy from a Twitter style timeline sucks, so I doubt we’ll see any Threads people on here.

    If it’s about data mining, there’s absolutely nothing preventing Threads from doing that already, as the entire protocol is completely open. All they need is one server that subscribes to every community, and every comment and upvote comes flowing in. One account on one beefy sever is all they need.

    • Link@rentadrunk.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      On the other hand, interacting with Lemmy from a Twitter style timeline sucks, so I doubt we’ll see any Threads people on here.

      I wouldn’t be so sure about that. I’ve seen people interacting from Mastodon here already.