• PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Proportionally?

    Germany lost about 6 million people out of a population of 70 million, so something to the tune of 8.5% of the population over the course of six years.

    In the current Gaza campaign, we’re coming up on 20,000 out of a population of 2 million, so something to the tune of 1% over the course of three months. Extended to the six years of WW2, that would be 41% of the population.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Factor in non-combatant casualties, and it will be even more disproportionate.

      Yeah, there were a lot of civilian deaths in ww2. But they largely at least tried to minimize the non-military casualties. That isn’t even a factor for IDF

      • Backspacecentury@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        You think the entire populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were military?

        Also, entire cities in Southern Germany were entirely wiped out. Munich was re-built from the ground up.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, there were a lot of civilian deaths in ww2. But they largely at least tried to minimize the non-military casualties

        I feel obligated to point out that the Brits in Europe and the Americans over Japan engaged in deliberate terror bombing.

      • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        You’ll probably never know how many of those deaths were combatants. Don’t forget that Hamas does recruit children as soon as they’re old enough to hold up a gun and pull the trigger.