Their jokes about assigning gender to babies and to being transgender, dressing in drag, like all of it was a send-up.

Sure, they did punch down if you were a person who were in those groups, but the fact that it was large enough social event to be relevant enough to be a comedy skit on a television show or a movie seen by millions implies that there were some serious things going on back then that they could see and wanted to address.

What the hell was going on that put all of those things in their mind?

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    In addition to the comments from others, it’s worth remembering that a lot of their humour is timeless. Shakespeare made drag jokes. The handsome cabin boy is as old as sailing.

    Basically, taboo is funny - and these subjects have been taboo for most of human history.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Check the history of comedy.

    Mel Brooks ‘The Producers’ movie had two gay men. Bugs Bunny was in drag in the 1940’s. “Some Like It Hot” came out in the 1950s. Heck, pretty much any Hollywood movie made before the Hays Code would have had gay gags.

    Milton Berle was the King of Comedy and he did drag for years.

    The Pythons didn’t invent anything

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      This is why the whole woke thing is so stupid to me.

      “I’m sick of Hollywood putting DEI bs in my movies not like the old days!”

      The old days: “Come see two men dress as women to escape the mob!”

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      This is it exactly. Before magnetic tape, Comedians told the same jokes For generations.

      Modern comedians act like they’re the first people to come up with jokes because of the first people to record them.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Sometimes I wonder about how many songs the average person would know throughout history. An ancient Roman would be exposed to songs from the entire Empire, while a 1000 AD English farmer might only hear a few dozen in their whole life time.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    I grew up in Seattle in the 80’s. I really thought all races and sexualities were accepted and that men and women were equal. Boy was I surprised to find out a lot of our nation was backwards as fuck.

    Monty Python made such sense to me philosophically so it was second nature to watch it. I didn’t even think of it as British and for me it will always be timeless

    Monty Python and its absurdities are a breath of fresh air in a world gone stale.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Let’s put this another way: why are the same routines from the 70s still relevant today? It’s like all the movements of one generation have had almost zero effect on society as a whole.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      problem is the progress goes to about then. I have often commented that things have been going downhill post seventies but it was hard to notice for awhile and I would get blowback on how bad particular groups had it. Thing is they had it way worse in the 60s and the 50s and have seen little progress in the eighties onward. Feels to me like progress pretty much stopped or reverted since then on the environment, our infrastructure, and our social programs but like the few decades before had massive progress.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Think about this. Public sex clubs like ‘Plato’s Retreat’ and gay bath houses were mainstream in the 1970s. Bette Midler got her start performing at a gay bath house. There were porn theaters catering to couples all over the place. AIDS came along and threw everything back fifty years.

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            Hey, I’m against condoms. They suck, and don’t feel very good for anyone. That’s why I got sterilized, and when I was dating I got tested regularly and insisted on the same from my partner(s).

            • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 days ago

              I once read a novel from the 1970s. There were a couple of thugs who were arguing over who’d had more STIs. It was a simpler, happier time.

  • Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Dressing in drag had been a staple ofEnglish comedy for decades if not much, much longer In the first world war guys were doing it for concert troupes (essentially, vaudeville acts by and for the soldiers.)

    • aasatru@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      It literally goes back to Shakespeare, something all Brits are completely aware of.

      In addition, transgender people have always been around, and it seems as if the conservatives have been terrified of them forever. So there’s obvious potential for comedic value.

      Echibit A: Queen, I Want to Break Free.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      This is the most correct answer. English Theater, historically, had men playing the women’s parts. There’s a long, long tradition of it. So MP dressing in drag follwed the tradition, the viewer might find it both appropriate, and humorously anachronistic, along with MP’s exaggeration of the characters makes for great humor.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    The UK is an incredibly Classist society with a long-running “know your place” kind of mindset and very low Social Mobility for an European nation - people very much are defined by their class (all the way to ther being a very specific, non-regional, English language accent for the upper class) and one’s social class is very much inherited.

    The 60s and the 70s were the peak point for the result of the post War (that being WWII) increase in social mobility in Britain with lots of Working Class lads and lasses making it big in, amongst others, the arts (and you see it not just in Comedy but also Acting more in general and especially in Music were almost every great British star from that age had working class origins).

    All this has in the meanwhile being reversed, hence once again almost all modern British artists are the sons and daughters of the upper-middle and upper classes.

    During that golden period the massive mix of people from all origins in the arts created all kind of original and “not knowing your place” art expressions, and I believe the Money Pythons are one of those.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        That’s such an interesting statement.

        Irrelevant for my post, since I lived in Britain for over a decade, but interesting.

        Thank you for sharing that tidbit about yourself.

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    the sexual revolution took place in the 60s/70s, partly due to invention of the contraceptive pill, which became available to unmarried women in 1967. homosexuality was partially decriminalized in 1967. abortion was legalized. no fault divorce was introduced.
    it was the biggest social movement of their lives, perhaps started by women joining the workforce for world war II.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      It was ABSOLUTELY started by women joining the workforce due to WWII.

      I like to make a joke how Hitler was the biggest driving force in the feminist movement. Not because I support Hitler, and not because I’m anti-feminist.

      I do it because it amuses me so much to say a wild and absurd claim like that, where womens feminists movements happened because of Hitler, and then watch their faces when I explain in a calm voice, with logic and reason, that there is a legitimate explaination for how all of womens progressive movements happened because of the most evil man in modern history.

      I make sure to carefully tiptoe around saying that HE was a feminist. He was not. I never claim that. But by making THE LISTENER frame it in their own mind that way, and then explaining facts and truths, their faces contort trying to find the flaw. It’s great.

      Again, not pro-hitler, not anti-feminism. Just very much pro-trolling chaos.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        To make your little prank more airtight you should say “driving force behind the feminist movement,” not “in the feminist movement,” because he was not in the feminist movement.

    • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      To summarize: America is like 50 years behind culturally rhe rest of the civilized world. They already got the social issues we are currently dealing with sorted out