• Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Fucking finally. Price of shit rapist. Maybe the Dutch will reform their legal system in-time for the next Olympics?

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Im not sure if any legal system would say a felon cant join the olympics. Unless you mean having draconian punishments like the US. Then no, I hope they dont damage their legal system to become that corrupt.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        He got 13 months for rape and only one of those months was actually their choice the other 12 was the UK government’s choice. Essentially they thought that one month of imprisonment for rape was acceptable.

        They clearly need some change.

        • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The Dutch need a metric fuckton of cultural reform. I’m saying this as a descendant of them in Canada.

          Blackface is not an acceptable holiday tradition, and marzipan is concentrated evil. Also fuuuuuuuuck rapists, you get nothing, you fucking LOSE, and you goddamn keep losing as an example to any other idiots, good day sir!

          • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Blackface is an American sensitivity, not Dutch. And there’s plenty of Dutch people as it is that are pushing for it to be changed because it’s seen as offensive to other countries, so there’s also that.

            • fantasyocean@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s not offensive to a country. It’s offensive to a group of people, particularly dark-skinned people. It is a form of mockery. Unless you’re trying to tell me that the Dutch people who partake in blackface aren’t doing it to mock black and dark skin people. If that’s the case, please educate me

              • Kedly@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Here’s a summation from another dutch poster @ClamDrinker@lemmy.world a while back:

                I’m sorry, but this is just really kind of disingenuous to start something like this next to a topic such as this. Your experience with one company or something is purely anecdotal and the controversy around Zwarte Piet is also very nuanced to this very day. The kind of nuance someone not from here will not get from a casual google search. For anyone that cares about actually understanding, here’s a rundown:

                Many people attributed Zwarte Piet as a fun and good role model for kids, not some kind of caricature clown to laugh at. Literally almost everyone grew up knowing and having a fond enjoyment of Zwarte Piet, like a childhood imaginary friend that always showed up when you needed a smile the most. And that creates a strong desire to set that positivity forth by continuing the tradition. It takes really good reasons to destroy something most people attribute to be part of the greater good of their lives.

                We try to understand racism, and strive to effectively reduce it rather than just mindlessly treat symptoms. Many people saw the existence of Zwarte Piet as a way to instill positive experiences to kids who might be isolated from having positive experiences with actual people of color. We know that in part racism comes about from not having enough (or too many bad) real world experiences with people of different skin colors. It is a type of fear of the unknown. As such, this still seems like solid reasoning. (Fun note, rats will also not help other stranger rats with a different fur color to escape even with no direct harm to themselves except when they have already lived alongside aside a rat with that fur color)

                Even people of color were not completely on one side, but for the ones that it hurt, it hurt loudly. Black people in the Caribbean (Also part of the Netherlands) still use Zwarte Piet to this day, because they do not care - They do not see the racism in it. Unfortunately there seems to be a correlation between being affected by racism and seeing the racism in Zwarte Piet, as many of us learned as the conversation marched on. And racists definitely did wield Zwarte Piet to make their racism be known. In a world without racism, Zwarte Piet would not be controversial. And many people were not acutely aware of the racism some people of color faced.

                The majority has wanted to get rid of it (since about 2018, actually), and most places have more accepted solutions in place now. But this does not mean that many people agree because we think Zwarte Piet is actually inherently racist. It’s because we’ve heard the concerns of people of color and weighed their burden to be more important to relieve than the perceived benefit of tradition and instilling a positive message on people that look different from yourself. It also didn’t help that the vast majority of people that still wanted to overrule those concerns were pretty obviously racist, which pushed even more people over the edge, because we don’t want to hold traditions in place that shield racists and bigots. Some countries could really learn from that.

                • Viri4thus@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  They won’t learn from that because some countries only exist because people wanted to run away from learning and continue barbaric practices like slavery. Some countries had a boost in civil rights when there was a brain drain due to the flight from the 3rd reich but that migratory blip has long since subsided and some countries are back to being the dumb backward barbarians they have always been and will always be. That is because some countries existence is predicated on inflicting barbarism upon weaker peoples so they can sustain constant growth, even if it means killing us all due to climate change or plunge their ancestors into war because they want to sabotage their way a life which is a constant reminder that they are not exceptional, they’re just a bastardised version of civilisation.