• thisfro@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    but you will not go bankrupt or become homless.

    Are you sure about that?

    • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yes quite sure, if you are homeless you are so by choice. The government will provide for you, not unconditionally (you are required to look for a job or reeducate) but they will.

      • thisfro@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        What if you can’t work? It was more of a rethorical question, as I know from personal experience, you can be very close to homelessness very quick. The different agencies will tell you that another is resposible and you get nothing for a very long time.

        Yes it is a lot better rhan in the US and other places, but homeless people being homeless by choice is just not true and frankly a disgusting claim.

        • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          Can you prove this is a systematic issue? I know various people who lost their job or had to claim IV and not one of these was at risk of loosing the roof over their head.

          • thisfro@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            9 days ago

            I don’t have to prove anything, as an indovidual case invalidates your claim.

            • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              No an individual case might be a mistake. You would have to proof a systematic behaviour of our government to prove that it does not usually work fine.