Yes, I assume the headline is based on what he was actually convicted of, highlighting that he’s a controversial figure, and the article itself provides the context. Seems unlikely he’d be convicted for the insults without the added context.
Found the article interesting since it’s at least an indication that the previous cadre of corrupt goons are getting sorted out. Not sure about how clean the current Sri-Lankan government is though.
Yes, I assume the headline is based on what he was actually convicted of, highlighting that he’s a controversial figure, and the article itself provides the context. Seems unlikely he’d be convicted for the insults without the added context.
Found the article interesting since it’s at least an indication that the previous cadre of corrupt goons are getting sorted out. Not sure about how clean the current Sri-Lankan government is though.