• Draces@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I did not misunderstand your bot theory but good to see you prove my “even if I agree” point lmao

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      You ended your comment saying you completely disagree with me after reiterating what I’d just said as if it were your own thought.

      You really need to work on your communication and reading comprehension buddy.

      • Draces@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        If you think it’s bots then that seems like a more legitimate complaint

        An easy way to win popularity contests is to stuff the ballot. On the internet, you can do this with bots

        You really need to work on your communication and reading comprehension buddy.

        Maybe try a mirror bud

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Try reading the whole thing and comprehending it as a complex thought with nuance. I’ll wait. Might take you awhile but I’ll wait.

          • Draces@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            On boy are you dense. I agreed if your theory that bots are to blame is correct you have a legitimate complaint I dispute that and you got really confused and angry saying I don’t understand instead of anything of substance. Do you know what projection is?