• Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The missing context here (I think) is that California passed a law saying that digital storefronts (like steam and gog) can’t say things like “buy game” because you aren’t actually gaining ownership of the game, but instead just buying a license to access it. Some people were questioning if this law should apply to gog since their games are drm free and can be freely installed on any compatible devices once you download the installer.

    • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It should because their use agreement makes it clear that you don’t own the games but are licensing them. That’s pretty much why they had to clarify what they said I’d imagine. IMO, proving the point of the law, really.

      • TheEntity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is equally true for almost any game ever sold, including physical ones. You only ever own a license that specifies what you can and cannot do with the game. The difference is in what this license is tied to, for example either a physical copy of a given game or an account that can be remotely deactivated taking away all your games. In GOG’s case once you grab the installer, the game license cannot be easily forcibly revoked, just as with the physical copy.