

Even if the LED is visible, is this enough to consider it consensual?


Even if the LED is visible, is this enough to consider it consensual?


If that’s it, I’m so in!
You do, because the other drivers cannot be expected to track whether that’s your only possibility.


Is this even about Chrome or the webpages themselves? I was under impression it’s the latter.


Who exactly do you mean by “I”? Preferably with an exact address, just so we know you’re serious about it.


deleted by creator


Can’t he just say he’s using them for training his AI? That seemed to work for Meta.


The title rubs me the wrong way. “Private alternatives” implies the US tech isn’t privately owned.


Assuming the Western hemisphere is theirs, it overlaps with both Northern and Southern hemispheres. It follows that these two are theirs too.


It can be both queer friendly and pure brainrot at the same time, these are not mutually exclusive.


The password cannot contain the Epstein’s client list.


They can have it. We just don’t want to federate with them, which doesn’t prevent them from having their own instance all for themselves.
That’s a weird way to spell “Super Nintendo”.


Surely they mean the Nobel Piss Prize.


And in turn Fandom is owned by Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales. Which makes me uncomfortable in strange ways.
Right, I was too vague too. See my other comment please.
I’m sure some people are perfectly okay with the bottom part and would consider it a great justification for the top part. That’s what I meant.
At first I thought I agree with the post and now I’m second-guessing what OP is trying to convey. This is an amazingly ambiguous picture when posted without further commentary.
It learned to huff copium.