• Palaress@lemmy.161.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    You are missing the point. If you have a big list of suspect phone-numbers you can put them into Signal and it will show all that have their phone numbers registered with Signal.

    Yes. That’s exactly what you get. A list of Signal users.

    That is a metadata leak and quite a significant one.

    Why is a user list in itself “a significant metadata leak”. You would need other information for that, like groups, contacts, online times or anything else. But you don’t get that, so I can only repeat my question: what is the problem with it?

    • poVoq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I explained that already in much detail elsewhere in this thread.

      tl;dr as a Signal user you are a minority that is automatically suspect to law-enforcement and when this meta-data is overlapped with other meta-data is is easy to narrow down a list of suspects and get legal permission to deploy more intrusive surveillance methods. In addition once that more intrusive surveillance method is deployed on a device, it can read other linked phone-numbers from Signal group-chats and thus those people are also compromised because phone-numbers are always linked to government issued identities (either explicitly or due to payments).