I think I understand what you mean. But then I slightly disagree : if we want to use such a useful program to randomize tests and a free software doing that does not exist, it is not a reason for a “policy maker” to buy a proprietary software, but a reason to pay a developer to write free code.
But if all you mean is “if you HAVE to buy proprietary software, at least do it for something more useful (like randomizing tests)”, yes of course I agree with that !
I imagine an alternate history where liberal waste was directed at actually attempting to making the world better while robbing it blind. It’s a world where no one is here because there is hardly anyone with an articulateable grievance against capitalism.
Thank you !
I think I understand what you mean. But then I slightly disagree : if we want to use such a useful program to randomize tests and a free software doing that does not exist, it is not a reason for a “policy maker” to buy a proprietary software, but a reason to pay a developer to write free code.
But if all you mean is “if you HAVE to buy proprietary software, at least do it for something more useful (like randomizing tests)”, yes of course I agree with that !
I imagine an alternate history where liberal waste was directed at actually attempting to making the world better while robbing it blind. It’s a world where no one is here because there is hardly anyone with an articulateable grievance against capitalism.