I was watching some YouTube, trying to find some forgotten gems from retro systems. I ran into one about the Jaguar and decided to watch it.
Well, the fellow said a lot of the games were great, and I was kind of curious about that because I donāt think itās controversial to say thereās only a handful of decent games on the Jag, but this fellow was rating everything highly.
Later on I sat down to think about it and I realized something⦠after every game the fellow would say āOh, and you can get it for about $XX.XX.ā
At that point the light-bulb went off and I realized this fellow is probably deriving enjoyment from collecting the Jaguar games, not playing them. To him, if he buys a game, plays it for a few minutes to make sure it works, itās probably a winner for him.
For me, who is getting Jaguar games from uhhhh a friend, I donāt care about collecting them, I just want some fun stuff to play.
Anyway, I learned my lesson: Iāll believe non-collectorsā opinions more than collectors because they are mostly concerned with gameplay instead of how it looks on the shelf, or how rare and difficult it was to acquire.
P.S. I donāt know how āhotā of a take this is, but I figure itāll probably hurt the feelings of collectors, so thatās why I prefixed it.
I like to watch Big Ole Words on YouTube. Heās a collector, and a player. He plays every game like heās a kid and just got it for Christmas, and itās the only new game he has. So, he tries really hard to find the fun in it. He has way, way more patience than I do, but he wonāt tell you a game is good when itās not. At least not from what Iāve seen.
I especially like the āgames no one playedā series of videos. I get to see exactly why no one played those games. š
Cool! I have some watchinā to do.