• wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t think this is correct. There was a marked post-Reagan shift to the right. Sure, they were never socialists, but decades ago they at least tried to do something for the working class.

    • ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      let’s be real this is being nitpicky cuz even if you’re right most of us cats were babies or eggs in reagans time. I’m old as fuck and i didn’t even get to vote till bill Clinton

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        No, I don’t think it’s nitpicky, and I think it’s relevant to modern day political discourse. It demonstrates that progressive policies and positions are a viable political strategy for the democratic party. I think it’s important to stress this, because a lot of liberals today feel like courting the right is the only way to possibly win an election for the democrats. Stating “always have been” plays into this delusion, and it’s good to remind ourselves that it’s a complete and utter falsehood.

        • ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          when you put it in those terms, i tend to agree.

          im only saying that if ya take ops statement “always has been” to mean “for longer than you’ve been living” then it’s nitpicky to bring up what the party was — in response to a joke meme comment — before anyone here was even born.

          but it’s not like we disagree or anything, nor did op explicitly say that. it was just my own readin.

          have a good one