• poVoq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 years ago

      As someone on neither side, I see only downsides in another cold-war starting between China and the US.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 years ago

        Not sure how that’s at all relevant to discussing China’s technological achievements here. A quantum computer with 113 detected photons is a huge achievement, and that’s the topic of the article.

        • poVoq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 years ago

          Quantum computing has (so far) no practical application other that potentially breaking current non-quantum cryptography and thus is inherently a militarized surveillance technology.

            • poVoq@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 years ago

              Some marketing blub that was probably the first thing that came up on a Google search isn’t going to convince me that are are any practical applications of quantum computing in the near future other than breaking cryptography.

                • poVoq@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  I am actually a bio-chemist by training and understand perfectly well… but quantum computing isn’t going to help with that any-time soon.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    So, your argument is that quantum computing isn’t going to help until quantum computing is sufficiently developed. You truly are a master of tautology. Exact same argument applies to breaking encryption by the way.