

offshores (sorry, I meant tax havens) like the Virgin Islands


offshores (sorry, I meant tax havens) like the Virgin Islands


Major EU Offshores law coming (e.g. Panama papers are from 2016, buttcoin also started going then)…but it was also the time that the "rest of the world"TM reached more than 50% web penetration…lots of things happened then to create the incentive and make possible the then new tools of manipulation to subvert elections.


Most people are not proud of their own turds…most…


'tis like watching a tennis match between a frog and a tree


I didnt know social spiders already existed, reminded me of this 2002 BBC speculative documentary: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0kGtDyuXMDU where the last mammals are hamsters that communal spider society herds :D


Oh look, that cheap hydro aluminium just found somewhere to go! :D thank you daddy tramp


Good science is boring, good politics is boring, good espionage is boring, good journalism is boring, good history is boring, good banking is boring, good business is boring. Entertainment serves us this pop view of the world…
But wikipedia is more valuable than all the LLM slop machines combined.
You need ground rules and objectives to reach any desired result. E.g. a court, an academic conference, a comedy club, etc. Online discussions would have to happen under very specific constraints and reach enough interested and qualified people to produce meaningful content…


The US and China are not equivalent in this. The UK is not neutral ground like Brazil or India where I agree that both need to be equally represented as opposite poles to balance.


Because it’s already built and the UK depends on the US militarily. China should not be given a chance to do the same.
PS: but it’s very easy, China can ask Moscow to build one there and I’m sure they’ll agree.


Just no more mega-embassies. That’s all, everyone knows what it means, it’s bad enough when a friend does it.


What duplicity? If you are not my ally, why should I let you do whatever you want on my turf? It makes no sense. You just sound like a 5-year-old trying to “it’s not fair” guilt people into allowing you to build another mega-embassy, which you already admitted is a bad thing for an ally to do, so it will be worse for an adversary.


So? The only person talking about the USA is you.


China is not the UK’s ally, so they should not act like they are. Maybe Moscow or Pyongyang will let the build a mega-embassy.


So they’re just going to use GitHub as a code training dataset? Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.


Just make it an official extension ffs…


russia annexed part of another country, in Europe, nobody was going to accept that long-term. Some probably thought they could buy time for putin to die or some political change to happen in order to deal with someone less fanatic. Merkel knew him well and she probably heard him rant at length about all his pet hates, she knew what she was dealing with. But boys will be boys.
PS: compare this
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/leaked-putin-remarks-on-ukraine-enrage-russia/ (putin threatening to invade Kiev in 2014)
with
https://www.newsweek.com/putin-reveals-why-he-didnt-launch-full-invasion-ukraine-2014-1788767 (putin says in 2023 he wanted to capture land “peacefully”)
So the best the EU could do was buy time to rearm Ukraine against invasion, keep things from escalating, and “hope” on the side that they change their mind through economic cooperation: https://www.eureporter.co/world/2014/10/01/letter-from-president-barroso-to-president-putin-2/


russia had plenty of room for deescalation and to save face before they decided to go all in in 2022 and annex country unilaterally again. After that, there was no point pretending anyone took Minsk seriously anymore.
hah, TIL, thanks!