Why, a hexvex of course!
Poor Mauro: they weren’t good at what they loved, they blamed others for their failings, and their community leader was nuts.
Jokes aside, we’ve already got toxic right there. Linus isn’t right, but someone like that would be fired with good cause. It’s one thing to make a mistake, it’s quite another to blame your co-workers for your own shoddy work.
What’s that Reddit phrase? ESH!
Y’see, back in the day parents were not technically literate because the world was mid-societal shift. “Protect the children” (because parents are unable to) had some justification.
Today, basic computer literacy is a survival skill in the UK. The level of literacy needed to track your own kid is not that high (or expensive to rent).
If you are letting kids use tech you don’t understand, and are not willing to invest the time/money to track yourself, that’s a you problem. It shouldn’t become a me problem.
As for “yeah but what about smart kids”, I’ve got some bad news for you. They will always find a way around ANYTHING you set up.
“Seek offence and you shall find it” - The secret mantra of Tumblr users
It’s a tricky one because if someone wants to be offended, they definitely will be. I once knew a guy who, for some reason, found the use of the word “slug” (in any context) intensely offensive. To this day, no-one ever learned why.
Back in my day, we went with “giving it riz”.
“Equivalent of a DVD player OS” is now my go-to insult for a bad OS.
I’ve specifically gone for a AAA battery powered one so I can just enjoy music while I work on proofs.
Phones are ok, but sometimes it’s just nice to be unreachable in a random room on campus where no-one can track you down to attend meetings.
Bonus points if students see you bopping to unknown tunes while you work and think you’re crazy.
A VR headset that is lightweight, has a decent battery, and has controls dictated by gesture and eye focus (so I can finally start sketching out 3D geometric objects and exploring a fun idea I had for a model of hyperbolic space)
Published academic (mathematics) here - I suspect my contributions have some value ;)
Post shower toilet thought: Copyright isn’t there to protect the author, it’s there to create a multi-billion dollar legal industry.
As someone whose salary is based on how much tuition others are paying, and who is losing about £1200 per year paying it back, I can categorically say it’s bad from both ends.
The tuition freeze has essentially meant universities in the UK have had a budget cut every year based on inflation, which is now driving a push towards international recruitment since they pay the bills.
The higher education sector is increasingly mimicking our school system (a true failure); with universities prioritising progression and student appeal over quality of education. Indeed, we even have our own “opt in” Ofsted (Office For Students), so eager is our government to see us follow the school system into ruin.
In 2008 we had the first great recession.
When it hit, public services were in a good place, and people did have enough saved to help cushion the blow. While I’d like to say Labour are to thank for that, their introduction of tuition fees (a measure now destroying higher education) shows that it isn’t always the case.
This time, public services are already “unhealthy” due to years of systematic under-investment and minor privatisations (why buy an MRI when you can rent it right?). People don’t have the savings to weather it due to a decade and a half of stagnant wages. A lot of this is thanks to Tory policies, and a good chunk of blame lies there.
So, we’re seeing a surge in people losing out, rather than overextended companies going bust. It feels “worse” this time because it isn’t people losing their jobs because a company went bust, it’s people starving and freezing while working full time.
Well, I know what I’ll be using to listen to my radio stations from now on. Really neat project!
Also, it doesn’t pick up user defined tags because it’s looking in the wrong place for them!
Row 114:
TAGS=( $(sed ‘s/ /\n/g’ stations.txt |grep “#”|grep -v “#Favorites”|sort|uniq|sed ‘s/#//g’) )
Should be
TAGS=( $(sed ‘s/ /\n/g’ $HOME/.cache/radion/stations.txt |grep “#”|grep -v “#Favorites”|sort|uniq|sed ‘s/#//g’) )
I think it was playing Golden Sun 2, when it is revealed that the world is slowly ending and that Saturas and Menardi were trying to save it.
It made me realise that real villains are just people doing what they believe to be right, whose priorities are different than your own. We’re all trying to live a “good” life in the end, and a lot of things are more easily forgiven in that light, but that doesn’t mean we’ll all get along either, because we’re all the villain in someone’s story!
Warlocked for GBC - it was ambitious as hell, and has some quality scenario ideas.
Surely it should be drawn well before that - even prior to legislation the simple iniquity that trans folk experience every day merits action.
I’m likely starting from a position of not being clear first thing in the morning, though the accusation was not welcome. As a side note, attraction is based on our ideals: I can see the most beautiful person in the world and have no attraction towards them because of the views the hold, or the actions they’ve undertaken - though here the ideals one holds for one’s own partner and the partners of others are different matters entirely (I very much doubt a straight man would approve of his gay friend’s choice of lover for his own!).
I am not arguing against such intolerance against intolerance, I am presenting the point that it’s a tricky subject. Legislation often follows public outcry, and over in the UK being trans is a protected characteristic (i.e. such legislation already exists). My personal view is that we SHOULD be working against trans-phobic people existing, both via well considered legislation and education. Though, that will involve deciding where a line should be drawn, why it should be drawn there, and won’t be accomplished via trying to stamp out the symptom rather than the disease.
Your own answer offers a far better example of disingenuity, at least so I feel.
It is socially acceptable not to date someone due to a biological trait (of which being trans is a prime example) you are not attracted to (i.e. personal preference), however (I certainly believe) it isn’t really socially acceptable to say "I don’t want to spend time with X because of " (your action is motivated by a personal preference). One is a clear matter where personal preference trumps, but the other is one where polite society forms an interesting grey area - where between those two is your line?
I’d disagree with the statement that you can be a nazi in your own home (a good strawman there), since that just means you’ll be training a nice younger crop of nazis (which is the real root of the issue), but that isn’t the question at stake here. It’s “why isn’t everyone up in arms against transphobia”, and the answer is that no-one can agree on where the line should be drawn, and most people are worries that it’ll turn out like every other attempt to stamp out particular ideals. However, in the spirit of charity, my line is drawn well before the person begins to shout “gas the Jews” in their own home, because prior to that the harm was already done.
Hate speech definitely removes freedoms and rights, but it is the ears that listen that determine whose rights and freedoms are removed. Will the crowd turn upon the person spewing hate (giving in to a morally acceptable hatered, thence rises the paradox), or will it follow the voice guiding them towards hatered.
It’s a tricky one because of the nature of the net. Let’s say we have three kids: Timmy, Jimmy and Harry.
Timmy starts looking up “tits”, because Timmy loves titties. He’s curious, and you probably want to have a talk about acting and how porn isn’t reality.
Jimmy, well, Jimmy saw a videogame character tied up and it made him feel good, so he starts looking for that online. He’s about to explore the BDSM scene. He’s going to need the “safe sane consensual” talk, otherwise his explorations might get him, or someone else, hurt. He’ll need more of a talk than Timmy!
Harry loves hentai; he found some when looking for pictures of his favourite cartoon character. Harry is going to need a long talk about fantasy Vs reality, otherwise he’s going to disappoint a lot of women! Wait a moment, most of the things he’s looking at involve animals and women… Might be time to get some therapy!
In all three of these cases a different style and level of parental intervention was required. You watch your kids because they’re kids, and kids are experts at getting themselves (and others) hurt. Parents need to watch their kids because it’s their job to intervene, and to decide the method of intervention.
However, we’ve not gone over the case of Lizzy, a girl cursed with religious fundamentalist parents. When they find out she’s more interested in girls than boys, she’ll be subjected to inhumane treatment to “fix” her. So there is a grey area here - not all parents should be parents.