Send me bad puns. Good puns welcome too.

  • 1 Post
  • 1.71K Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2024年6月13日

help-circle

  • Like, we do need to address it but how do we minimize the resistance that comes from the defensiveness of “dont call me bigot?”

    I mean, I have no idea but anyone will get defensive over something this simple then they can frankly take a hike. Movements can (and in fact are more likely to) succeed without selling their souls to the centrist devil.

    We all need to learn that past mistakes are only a permanent mark if we do nothing to change them

    Yes, but the first step of the process of rectifying past mistakes is for someone to point out those mistakes. Someone who rejects criticism of their past mistakes outright is nothing more than a liability.


  • I mean, there’s no one right answer, and other people probably have better ideas for radicalizing moderate movements, but there are wrong answers and shutting down internal criticism as “divisive” or whatever the centrist thought terminating cliche of the day is is definitely one of them, and on that front this thread is not a good indication. If I had to say something it’d be “maintain minimum standards and don’t compromise with centrists,” but that’s not really the point I’m making here. People need to be confronted with their biases and pushed to be better if they’re going to, you know, be better (which is necessary because feckless moderate liberals don’t overthrow fascists).


  • No part of what you said addresses my point, so I’ll repeat myself: Resistance movements have to worry about being coopted from the inside almost as much as they do about being crushed from the outside. Introspection and self-awareness are crucial if this movement is going to survive. Internal conflict is often rightly cited as a danger to any movement, but it’s also a survival mechanism that shouldn’t be shut down out of hand.



  • If you don’t address the inaction, you won’t beat the system. “We can address all the systemic issues in our movement after our movement succeeds” has borne out in history approximately 0 times. More often either the movement fails entirely or it’s coopted by its most conservative elements who turn it into something completely different.














  • The country of Tiananmen Square?

    True but irrelevant.

    The country whose people practically develop an ever-changing coded language to avoid big brother coming down hard on any sort of criticism?

    Yes. I never said that China tolerates criticism, but that doesn’t mean Chinese people live in fear of their government. An incompetent government will have criticism coming from every which way, necessitating draconian measures and exaggerated crackdowns, which does lead to fear (ask me how I know). This isn’t the case for China because, despite their faults and the evil shit they get up to, Chinese people are generally satisfied with their governance. Fear isn’t an automatic result of authoritarianism; it appears when there’s too little carrot and too much stick.

    The country that runs “reeducation” camps for many who do get caught?

    True but irrelevant.

    The country that has Uyghurs and Tibetans to blame “within,” and Japan without? Or the US?

    Source? Not for their oppression of Uighurs and Tibetans, or rivalry with the US and Japan, I know about these, but that they’re using any of these as scapegoats for their own troubles. Oppression can be motivated by things other than scapegoating, and it’s not like China is lacking in real reasons to oppose the US and Japan. Without something that corroborates your claim this is just a non-sequitur.

    Where senior cadres of the party magically grow richer?

    This is just a non sequitur. Senior CCP officials are rich, but the other half of your claim “everyone else pretty much won’t” goes against everything we know about Chinese economic growth.