Women Who Code might not be a good choice… https://www.vice.com/en/article/g5v53w/girls-who-code-team-up-with-tomahawk-missile-maker-raytheon
But I’m definitely excited to see Tor and Fight for the Future on the list!
Women Who Code might not be a good choice… https://www.vice.com/en/article/g5v53w/girls-who-code-team-up-with-tomahawk-missile-maker-raytheon
But I’m definitely excited to see Tor and Fight for the Future on the list!
The issue is whether the data is collected by a known third party tracker domain which would be blocked by an adblocker
They are an anti science organization. They oppose nuclear power, GMOs, etc.
Yeah, it’s the second one you said, see https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/what-if-we-kissed-in
When it was brand new there were some edge case bugs that broke on certain workflows and hardware, but that’s pretty much entirely fixed now and I’m guessing for a long time now it’s been more universally stable than pulseaudio was.
Also, some people just pointlessly dislike anything that’s new, or because it breaks their spacebar heating
Because it’s funny
I’ve been using Wayland on Nvidia with plasma for about a year and it’s been mostly fine. Only a few minor issues like night color not working or some Xwayland apps flickering, but the system feels far more responsive on Wayland so it’s well worth it to me
Friends don’t let friends not use ublock origin
Knowing reddit, I’m willing to guess they weren’t even talking about actual CSAM either, but instead whining that a certain instance allows lewd drawings of certain fictional characters that are “totally equivalent to real kids being abused!!1!” according to them
I think what they meant by contrarians is people who disagree for the sake of disagreeing without any actual argument , usually in order to stir up drama or engage in a circlejerk
As long as the audio frequency is less than half the sample rate, it is a mathematical function with only one (exact) wave that is able to fit all 4 points, so it is perfectly reconstructed. This video provides a great visualization of it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIQ9IXSUzuM
At both algorithms’ highest levels, xz seems to be on average a few percent better at compression ratio, but zstd is a bit faster at compression and much much faster at decompression. So if your goal is to compress as much as possible without regard to speed at all, xz -9
is better, but if you want compression that is almost as good but faster, zstd --long -19
is the way to go
At the lower compression presets, zstd is both faster and compresses better
It means it can capture any frequency up to half the sample rate, perfectly. The “extra detail” in the waveform is higher frequencies beyond the range of human hearing
Why? What reason could there possibly be to store frequencies as high as 96 kHz? The limit of human hearing is 20 kHz, hence why 44.1 and 48 kHz sample rates are used
However, it is very patent encumbered and therefore wouldn’t make for a good standard.
Both slower and worse at compression at all its levels.
Oh okay, my mistake. Thanks for pointing that out