12·
1 day agoRemoved by mod
- 0 Posts
- 202 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: August 10th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
It does if youre literate. Thats a tall ask on here though.
China gains as much as $13 in trade revenues for every $1 invested in ports. A firm holding an operating lease or concession agreement reaps not only the financial benefits of all trade passing through that port but can also control access
Chinese firms hold operating concessions in 10 African ports. Despite the risks over loss of control, the trend on the continent is toward privatizing
Ports in which Chinese firms have equity arrangements provide similar leverage over port operations. Notably, under China’s technical standards for “military civil fusion” (junmin ronghe; 军民融合), many Chinese state owned commercial shipping and civilian air cargo capabilities meet military specifications for defense logistics purposes.
1·4 days agoWtf. I say they should be expelling people and you jump right to bombing boats.
Never support action huh
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd0ydjvxpejo
Seems more like its you who doesnt understand the threat.
https://africacenter.org/spotlight/china-port-development-africa/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=W3Ek6HZ5nD4&t=670
The only thing clear is if yoy do business with them they will take control of whatever it is they build. And acti g like they wont use it for military means when needed is a childs mentality.
https://africacenter.org/spotlight/china-port-development-africa/
I dont have to try. Theyre selling everything to the chinese already. Acting like china wont use these for military opperations when needed is just stupid
No. Its not. Go read about their lease agreements. Theyre doing the same thing just through financial means.
“Anything less than having greenland in our hand is unacceptable”
You dont seem to understand trump doesnt give a fuck about your statutes or your “law”. You know what makes “law”. The biggest gun.
No troops massing at your border is PAST the last opportunity. You have already lost at that point. You dont seem to understand how this will play out.
This is the last opportunity.
Sp they dont roll over and give trump more ammo to conti ue to take over foreign territories. Or have you not heard. Hes now president of venezuela. Why do YOU want to wait ustil theres an entire fleet of ships off greenlands coast to begin preparing.
1·8 days agoIts not lossless.
Bullhlshit. You think they werent using your libraries before for profit.
Free software shouldnt mean that every company can use our code in anyway they like.
That is exactly what free means. I have never seen people write attributions for nuget or js packages used.
Its not about how they treated the guests.
Because the next step is troops in greenland. Good luck with that.
You’re confidently missing the point.
No one is saying Denmark should “break the treaty for fun.” The argument is about strategic preemption, not vibes. Treaties aren’t magic shields, they’re conditional frameworks that already collapse the moment an invasion happens. Yes, treaties have repercussions. That’s exactly why the discussion exists. Sanctions vs. occupation is not a hard comparison. One hurts your economy; the other erases your sovereignty. Pretending those are equivalent outcomes is absurd. And “waiting for us to incur repercussions” only makes sense if waiting actually improves Denmark’s position. If an invasion is imminent, waiting doesn’t preserve legality, it just burns time and leverage.
Also, international law explicitly allows anticipatory self-defense under imminent threat. This isn’t some Reddit-brained loophole; it’s been debated for decades. You acting like no one’s considered that doesn’t make it true.
So yeah — people have thought about this. You just seem locked into a cartoon version of how treaties and warfare actually work.
Not just rich people. The world cup in quatar proved that.
You go ahead and turn the other cheek so trump can black both your eyes amd take your land while hes at it. Backstabbing would be doing it for no reason. You have been threatened. This is self defence. Which unsuprisingly is not something europeans are very good at. As shown by your strongly worded letter in the face of multiple terrorist nations targetting you, and unwillingness to do amything against russia. Hell homny years did it take you all to stop buying thier gas after they attacked ukraine. Im sure another strongly worded letter will definately stop the us from invading your country or kidnapping your leaders. The us is ally to NO ONE anymore. Get that through your thick frozen skulls
Ypu didnt expect it and still see things in black and white. The fact you werent able to process the previous post proves my point.
Basically, yes. Just more sensitive.
Do you really…
“Some” is doing a lot of work in that statement.