• @sibachian@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    i infuriates me how microsoft is stealing tax money and has held a global monopoly for decades. especially when there are free alternatives. it isn’t even legal for a foreign private company to hold monopoly and extract tax wealth. most other software they use follow these rules, so why not windows/office?

    • @3arn0wl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      It infuriates me too.

      I really don’t understand how it’s acceptable for shops to sell devices pre-loaded with Micro$oft products, without letting the consumer know that there’s the license fee included in the purchase. But, as you say, this practice has gone on for decades.

      • @sibachian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        that too, that just further adds to the issue. hell, industry standards like adobe literally only exist because they didn’t pursue pirates (profit came from business license) and the adobe suite was the only tools people knew at the time due to being available for “free” to home users. a statement which the CEO admitted, but then had to redact.

    • @sexy_peach@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Imagine the software that could have been written with the money that microsoft sucked up into their shitty OS

      • @sibachian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        and contribute to society/the world while doing it.

        so many opportunities has been lost because of capitalism. it’s not like private companies ever take risks either, they use the freely available research and development we paid for with our taxes and then sell it back to us as a product.

        nope. open source everything. it’s the only way to save the planet.