• NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was going to say that this might actually be a good idea, but then I remembered how often AI summaries get key details completely the wrong way around.

    I still think it’s a good idea in concept: modding is hard, or so I hear, and this could be a very valuable tool if it worked as it’s supposed to. I doubt it would.

    There are some details that I’d have done differently too, if I was somehow forced to implement something like this. For example, for each point in the summary (e.g. “talks about US politics”) there should be a list of comments/posts by the user to exemplify what they say and how they write. It’s useless if the summary doesn’t show you what it’s based on.

  • leopardpuncher@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What the fuuuuuck 😳

    I can see how that could be a useful mod tool, but still (see line 1).

    So happy I left that hellhole 😮‍💨

    Edit: Although I guess this means I should have invested the time in deleting all my posts; probably too late now 🙄

    And damn, now I really want to know what their AI thinks of me! 😅