Civilförsvarsminister Carl-Oskar Bohlin (M) blev förföljd av Palestinademonstranter när han var på väg från riksdagen. Nu utreder polisen brott. – Man ska som förtroendevald i Sverige inte behöva bli förföljd till sitt hem av någonting som känns som en lynchmobb, säger ministern till SVT.
Every part of it is from the state’s perspective. First from the minister involved, then from the police, and then the prime minister.
No part of the article includes anyone else involved, or even anyone not involved but from the pro-Palestine side.
The fear mongering of “what will they do next?! 😧” also never gets challenged.
Israel is committing violence upon Palestinians and this minister was shamed for his involvement, and he equates that with violence committed upon him. He’s a coward with a victim complex and unfortunately the state and media right behind him backing him up.
If it were purely a retelling it wouldn’t have the perspectives of police and the prime minister who weren’t there…
A transcript is a retelling, this is not that.
And no, hence why I responded to the translation.
My inability to read Swedish has no bearing on my ability to discern bias in this instance. There’s no nuance that needs to be read between the lines from the primary source language.
Your getting angry doesnt change anything. Use your head, not your emotions.
Well, for one, at least the full interview: the questioning on his and his governments involvment in the Gaza genocide it feels the question from the SVT side is very incincere as they do not have a opponent that can represent that position, nor does hosts bring that position up. They just let the minister use the program for his view on the involvment. Usually what they do, at least for the far-right, is that they say that they cannot discuss certain topics as they do not have someone there to represent that point of view. Here, on the topic of genocide, they instead bring up the question and let his say his piece. The minister also talks about how these people in the pro-palestine movement has no limit to what they will do, but it is the anti-pro-palestine people who have actually committed acts of violence, such as driving into a protest, but SVT does not reply to this statement nor have a opposing side present.
And why is that?
What mumblefish said.
Every part of it is from the state’s perspective. First from the minister involved, then from the police, and then the prime minister.
No part of the article includes anyone else involved, or even anyone not involved but from the pro-Palestine side.
The fear mongering of “what will they do next?! 😧” also never gets challenged.
Israel is committing violence upon Palestinians and this minister was shamed for his involvement, and he equates that with violence committed upon him. He’s a coward with a victim complex and unfortunately the state and media right behind him backing him up.
It’s a retelling of what happened, caught on video… gtfo
And you probably can’t even read the fucking article in the first place
If it were purely a retelling it wouldn’t have the perspectives of police and the prime minister who weren’t there…
A transcript is a retelling, this is not that.
And no, hence why I responded to the translation.
My inability to read Swedish has no bearing on my ability to discern bias in this instance. There’s no nuance that needs to be read between the lines from the primary source language.
Your getting angry doesnt change anything. Use your head, not your emotions.
Well, for one, at least the full interview: the questioning on his and his governments involvment in the Gaza genocide it feels the question from the SVT side is very incincere as they do not have a opponent that can represent that position, nor does hosts bring that position up. They just let the minister use the program for his view on the involvment. Usually what they do, at least for the far-right, is that they say that they cannot discuss certain topics as they do not have someone there to represent that point of view. Here, on the topic of genocide, they instead bring up the question and let his say his piece. The minister also talks about how these people in the pro-palestine movement has no limit to what they will do, but it is the anti-pro-palestine people who have actually committed acts of violence, such as driving into a protest, but SVT does not reply to this statement nor have a opposing side present.