Germany plans to treat the use of date rape drugs like the use of weapons in prosecutions as part of measures to ensure justice for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

“We classify date rape drugs, which are increasingly used as a widespread tool in crimes, as weapons. This creates the basis for significantly stricter prosecutions,” Alexander Dobrindt, the interior minister, said on Friday. “We are committed to clear consequences and consistent enforcement. Women should feel safe and be able to move freely everywhere.”

Nearly 54,000 women and girls were the victims of sexual offences in Germany in 2024 – an increase of 2.1% on the previous year – of which nearly 36% were victims of rape and sexual assault.

  • LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Ridiculous overreach of justice yet again. Psychotropic substances usually associated with date rape like GHB/Liquid Ecstasy are used recreationally by the overwhelming majority of people. The fact that they can be used to for sexual assault is tragic, but nobody should be charged with a crime they did not commit.
    Slippery slope, but what else can you expect from these clowns.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If I punched you, that would be assault.

      If I hit you with a hammer, that would be assault with a weapon.

      If I stood beside you with a hammer and did not harm you at all, then I have not committed any crime.

      No-one is going to be charged with crimes they didn’t commit because of this. Classifying them as a weapon is only relevant for cases in which they were actively used to commit sexual assault, much the same way that a hammer only counts as a weapon if I assault you with it.

      Though I understand why you came away with the impression you did — I am often exasperated at weird drug laws that are overly prohibitive and often unscientific in how they criminalise relatively low risk drugs, which meant that I also initially had the same reading of this news as you did. Fortunately, it seems that this is not an example of one of those silly drug laws, but an actually sensible measure.

      • LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That seems more sensible than how I initially understood it. Thanks for taking the time to elaborate.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      By an overwhelming majority? Really? Seems just a tad exaggerated…

    • Vespair@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      In the way that sometimes a hammer can be a tool and sometimes a hammer can be a weapon, so can drugs. Two things can be true.