• NFT screenshotter@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Darwin (unix/BSD) is open source […] and by law, they can’t close that source code

    Darwin is open source to avoid having to open source other components to macOS while still adhering to various licenses for software it depends on for. If Apple could legally close source that part of the OS they would in a heartbeat, they’ve already gone out of their way to make it nearly impossible to use by (iirc) obfuscating the compiler forcing users to reverse engineer the compiling process for newer versions of darwin.

    • sibachian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      they would if they could. which is my point. without a replacement OS in the pipes, apple would be shooting themselves by demonizing open source software in front of the government.