They do because that’s factually correct. But is it worth reporting that a government website reflects events?
It would be news in my opinion if there was an actual message behind it. But since there’s no warning, not even partial, it doesn’t carry political weight – which in my think the headline implies (though the article makes it clear that it’s not).
Basically, the headline can be reduced to “German agency does its job”
They do because that’s factually correct. But is it worth reporting that a government website reflects events?
It would be news in my opinion if there was an actual message behind it. But since there’s no warning, not even partial, it doesn’t carry political weight – which in my think the headline implies (though the article makes it clear that it’s not).
Basically, the headline can be reduced to “German agency does its job”
To be fair, any government agency in any country actually doing its job is actually newsworthy.