• darko@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    7 days ago

    47% only? I thought it was much worse. But yeah if I go to my local grocery store that is 300 meters from where I live, and anything I buy we send 1-2% of the value to a company that is thousands of miles away, it makes no sense. Surely there should be a better way

    • Heiliger Strohsack@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I do not claim to know the big/whole picture of their business model, but to minimize your contribution to their profit I think you could pay with cash.

        • Pringles@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          If these are small operations, they really appreciate you paying cash, as they will keep more. If you do that consistently and build a good rapport they will genuinely become friendly with you, which can have unexpected benefits that are not very tangible.

    • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I wonder what the global reach is for those two companies, much of the online world appears to ultimately be powered by them.

      We need alternatives for everyone.

    • noughtnaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well maybe the transactions themselves aren’t ripped through USA, but since the introduction of SWIFT they get a copy of every single transaction even if you use a national debit/credit card. I’ve honestly no idea why that makes any sense.