• collegefurtrader@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    After promising safety in exchange for cooperation, and presumably without having convicted them of anything besides their former party affiliation?

    • Skoobie@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah, now I will admit to there having been a potential nuance. I certainly would want a trial before an execution, for instance. But I also think it would be wrong to assume these scientists were completely morally innocent. Maybe I could be persuaded from my earlier opinion of “You always shoot a Nazi” but there needs to be something to show. A diary entry saying “I’m not sure about this Hitler fella.” Something.

      • Flumsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Either trial him OR make a deal. You cant make a deal and after getting what you want proceed to trial him.

      • _iamnotcutoutforthis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        What you’re suggesting is stooping to the level of the nazi cruelty by a complete breach of agreement even after the other party has fulfilled their terms. Also what was that pathetic attempt at baiting the other guy by saying: “aRe yOu SuGgEsTiNg iT iS wRoNg tO sHoOt NaZiS?!!”. Like that wasn’t even the point of the other guy.