In their reply,

• They implied that they think I believe a narrative that I never promoted
• They imply without evidence that Cloudflare has good intentions when its basis of existence is as Project Honeypot
• then create a FUD strawman and justify ban when the voting ratio on the comments and in the post indicate a different kind of dialogue
• totally ignore that my job is privacy and security advocacy, and make it a point to leverage Cloudflare over all the historical and current concerns that loom around them

Awesome. I can play these pony tricks all day.