• venji10@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think a blog named “iOSLife” belongs here. Apple is one of the worst offenders in terms of privacy violations.

      • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Looking at your post & comment history it becomes blatantly clear that you’re the poorly written AI spreading propaganda here…

      • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hi, once again just gonna ask for help identifying where my site is on a blocked list. If you can’t, then I would appreciate you stopping from saying that. Thanks! :)

          • stankmut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            The user mentioned a blocklist, but I’m not able to find that list either. If we are going to accuse someone of maliciously pushing an agenda, I’d like a little more proof before jumping on the bandwagon.

          • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I also searched it on Google and DDG and didn’t find it on the blocklist.

            At this point I can only assume you are trolling by saying the same thing over and over again. I’ve made it very clear I am not promoting anything, rather just looking for opinions on the best options.

          • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, they did but my domain isn’t on that list from what I can tell. I’d love to know the list you found it on.

  • macallik@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think the article appears biased because searxng appears to offer the same functionality as Kagi, in spite of being free, yet Kagi is shown to be the best in class for some reason? Also it doesn’t touch on the critique that kagi having a login potentially aggregates all of your searches into one account that is stored by one company.

    • jard@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      From my understanding, Kagi counts searches against accounts based on how many times that account has accessed the search endpoint. That is, multiple repeated searches (over a period of time) are treated as unique searches.

      According to them, searches are cached for 2 minutes, and next page results are also counted as a unique search.

    • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kagi’s privacy policy claims that “Searches are anonymous and private to you. Kagi does not log and associate searches with an account.”

      SearXNG is tricky because the privacy policy comes from whatever instance you are using.

      Anecdotally, I have had better results from Kagi than SearXNG. The SearXNG instance I have been testing out keeps getting rate limited and mostly shows results from Qwant and Bing.

      I don’t really have a bias as I am testing out all of these options and trying to find the one that works best for my family.

      • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Kagi can claim whatever they want in their privacy policy. Where’s the code of their servers? Because I see none. How do we know they aren’t keeping logs that could be easily correlated (by themselves or a third party who access their servers)?

        Even if we had the code, I would still be skeptical, we can’t be sure what code are they exactly running on the server side and having an account linked to every search is just awful.

        SearXNG is anonymous while offering the very same features, if not better.

        • jard@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          we can’t be sure what code are they exactly running on the server side

          The same can be said about the hundred random SearXNG instances floating around on the Internet. How do you know that some of those aren’t running custom binaries that are then linking your IP to your search queries and sending them off?

          The only true solution is to self host, but the majority of people are looking for a quick and easy Google/DDG replacement, not to completely overhaul their digital life.

          • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You aren’t wrong about not knowing if SearXNG instances are running a modified version of SearXNG that tries to log you.

            Fortunately, we don’t need to trust those instances. They do not require you to login, so there’s not an unique identifier (like an account) to associate your searches with other than your IP address which you can hide with a VPN, or even better, using a .onion instance (something that Kagi does not have at all AFAIK).

            For using Kagi, no matter if you switch your IP address every time, if you delete cookies after closing your browser or if you buy a new laptop for every search query, you’re uniquely identified because you need to log into your account.

            And for that account, you have to use a payment method. Sure, you can try and pay with a Monero to Bitcoin exchanger and do not give any personal information (and if we’re being realistic, we know most Kagi clients aren’t doing this). Even if you paid anonymously, you can only achieve pseudonymity because you’re associated with your account.

            With SearXNG, I could use a different .onion instance for each query and be completely anonymous (that’s completely overkill, but it illustrates my point well).

            • jard@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Anonymity is not the same as privacy, because the latter fundamentally entails a measure of trust between two parties over the control of personally identifying information. Note that this is contingent on whether that personal information is exchanged.

              In the situation you described, privacy is irrelevant in either case, whether you access a SearXNG instance with a VPN/Tor or use a pseudonym and Monero payments to access Kagi, because no personal information was exchanged in the first place.

              The “privacy” in both situations then becomes how difficult it is for a bad actor to deanonymize you, which comes down to whether you can trust that the VPN service you’re using isn’t logging your traffic and the email service your pseudonym is on won’t just give up your data… or whether Tor isn’t being actively deanonymized via malicious exit nodes controlled by certain three-letter government agencies. This isn’t a fault on either search engine, IMO.

              • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No. Kagi’s fault is needing an account, a unique identifier which all searches could be correlated to.

                SearXNG could leak your IP if your VPN provider was keeping logs? Definitely. And so does Kagi. Tor could be attacked by a three letter agency and compromise your .onion connection to SearXNG? Definitely. And it would be easier to de-anonimyze you when connecting to Kagi, which doesn’t have an onion domain. Do you need to give SearXNG your email and/or payment information? Not at all. But Kagi requires it. Can you look like two completely different users when doing two queries to SearXNG? Easy. Not possible with Kagi. Do we have the server’s code? We do for SearXNG instances. We don’t have Kagi’s.

                I think it’s pretty clear the privacy compromise here.

        • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a good point that I hadn’t considered. I do like the idea of SearXNG, but didn’t have great results when testing it. Maybe I should give it another shot on another instance.

        • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Friend, I am just responding to your false claims with information from the privacy policy so that other users can be informed with what is clearly stated

            • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If you notice, I am only including more information when someone (mostly you) has brought up concerns about one of the offerings. If you had brought up concerns around Whoogle, then this conversation would be about Whoogle instead of Kagi. I am not promoting anything and my post clearly says,

              Which one should I choose? That’s up to you and what your threat model is. Each one of the products I listed have pros and cons. They all have different and unique feature sets. They all pull from different search indexes. You should choose the one that provides the best results and amount of privacy you desire.

              I’d love to have more discussion around the other offerings in my post and even ones not listed.

  • Dominik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The comments here perfectly show what’s wrong with this community, “You don’t agree that my favourite service is #1 you’re clearly biased/a bot/paid”

    “Your fav service has this problem use xyz instead” “XYZ has the exact same problem” “ahhh paid shill you’re super biased”

    “I’ve never heard of your website before, you’re clearly a paid shill/bot”

    “Ahhh they use crash logs, nothing should ever collect crash logs because I like it when the software I have never gets fixed”

    “How dare you even talk about something that isn’t free > free as in libre and not as in price oh wait no I mean as in price because I will never pay for anything”

      • Dominik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I totally agree with you critical thinking and discussion is the best that can happen but at least at the time of writing my comment i didn’t see any of it, most of what i saw was:

        • “you’re a bot/this is written by a bot”
        • “the website got iOS in it, it doesn’t belong here”,
        • “I never heard of that website, it’s just an AD”(if if its true it would be helpful but IMO its just someone trying to write articles and trying to get better) - - “you’re a shill/are paid”,
        • “the downsides of SearXNG don*t matter because you you can use a different instance” (thats a bit like saying “yes Google got downsides but you can switch to bing, yahooy, yandex, baidu”(obviously over the top example))
        • “I like Kagi, its the best 10$/month that i spend” (this one at least got got a tiny bit of substance but is also not helpful)

        The only helpful things that I saw were when people pointed out spelling mistakes.

        if it seems “horribly biased” let them know why you have that feeling so they can improve on it.

        I also don’t see how a paid service is antithetical (nice word btw, never heard it before) to privacy > yes Kagi might be able to link all searches to each account (I didn’t do too much research on how they implemented it) but that doesn’t mean that its not possible to implement it in a way were they wouldn’t be able to do that.

        So yea, critical thinking and discussion GoGoGo but “you’re wrong, I’m right lol”(obviously made up but some comments here (meaning this community not just this post) give me that feeling) is none of that

  • Linus_Torvalds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kagi user myself. Great experience, worth the $10.

    Side note: Your posts feels a bit like self-promotion 🫥

    • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, Kagi seems pretty cool so far.

      Not trying to self-promote, just looking for feedback on my findings and to see if anyone has other opinions to share around the products

        • long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          that’s still only pseudonymity. with SearXNG or even with Duckduckgo, I can just open a new window of my browser with a different IP and be a completely different person. Hell, I can even use a different SearXNG instance and my search query won’t even go through the same server than before. With Kagi, that’s impossible. You must always be logged in your account. Every search you do, could be potentially linked to your account.

    • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see how it’s self-promotion if there’s no profit to be made. In my book, it’s no different than someone making a text post here.

      • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think all of the “drama” in this thread could’ve been solved with me copy and pasting my words into a self post

  • digger@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I appreciate that you included sections of the relevant privacy policies. I like your approach.

    Please run what you write through spell check. You misspelled: extremely, business, advertisers, educated, and default. The word October could be capitalized, but as part of a hypothetical search query, it could be lower case on purpose.

    Lastly, Qwant is struck through in your last sentence. It’s unclear if you chose that formatting because you don’t recommend it (as stated earlier) or for some other reason.

    Keep writing! We need more of this!

    • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh yikes. Those are egregious spelling errors hahaha. Thank you for reading and the feedback!

      Yes, I struckthrough Qwant since they are sending your IP to Microsoft with every search. :)

    • Vent@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      People aren’t allowed to post their own stuff now? That’s been the norm since forever.

        • Vent@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If nobody was allowed to post their own stuff, then things like official comic accounts wouldn’t exist. Or official accounts in general.

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That seems unwise.
              It would be better to have some known corporate accounts, than only unknown corporate accounts.

        • Vent@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Before the internet even existed. You are aware that forums have existed before anyone made an account on Lemmy, right?

          • ram@bookwormstory.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The etiquette of other forums don’t define the etiquette here. You’re aware that the entire internet doesn’t exist in a monoculture, right?

        • Vent@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who do you ask permission from and how? Message the mods? Post a poll?

          • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I assume that the Reddit format has carried over to Lemmy, and obvious things are obvious enough. I also assume that you are an adult who has used internet enough to be able to sign up for and use Lemmy.

    • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh. Sure. I truthfully was just looking for some feedback on my findings and didn’t see any rules against posting articles written by self.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I did not remove your post because I can see your good intent and organic content. But Lemmy is starting to grow, so its better to refine things a bit more.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t even read OP’s post but…

      You state that Kaji is the best when actually they are clearly the worst

      It’s Kagi not Kaji. If you’re going to criticize something at least get the name right.

      If you pay them then everything you do on their site is linked directly do you.

      Privacy is not anonymity… and it’s a pev of mine that people confuse this.

      However, you can get pretty close to anonymity paying them in crypto:

      https://help.kagi.com/kagi/plans/payment-methods.html

      These “articles” from unknown websites su h ad ioslife are clearly a native ads, this one for Kaji. Kaijis marketing agency has a lot of bots on this platform so it will get upvotes and but you are fooling nobody.

      👎

        • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hey could you point me to the blocklist that my domain is currently on? I am not able to find it on any public list. It also would be extremeley surprising to me if it was on a list as this is the first article I have shared with the world.

    • jard@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They do share data with a notorious 3rd party tracking company.

      Care to give any details?

        • jard@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Anonymous logs are shared with Sentry when bugs, crashes, or warnings occur for debugging purposes.”

          It is quite a leap in logic — a non sequitur, even — to go from “debug crash logs sent to a crash reporting service” to “your personal information is being shared with third parties,” especially since Sentry themselves advise that their own users (developers) should not send personal information to them.

          Please give the evidence detailing what personally identifying information Kagi collects and how they send it to Sentry, since you clearly know how things work internally in there.

            • jard@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Searching for Sentry with your supplied source gives nothing helpful, in fact Exodus doesn’t even list Sentry as a tracker here. I’m sure a “well known and notorious” tracker should be listed as such.

              So again, citation needed. Link evidence of these claims.

                • jard@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The non-exhaustive list of Python, Swift, Java and native bindings for the Sentry SDK are all FOSS by your own criterion, so I’m not sure where this whole FOSS diatribe is coming from.

                  Again, can you send a direct link to a credible source (read: not a remark to “look it up myself”) that presents the evidence on exactly how Sentry aggregates and collects personal data? Your criticism about corporate privacy policies boiling down to a “just trust us bro” mentality can be applied to your own claims and chain of comments: without any evidence I’m forced to take your assertions at face value and “just trust you bro.”

    • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      TIL I am a bot. :)

      I also made it a point not to state anything is the best or the worst and mentioned that the choice is up to you and your threat model.

      Also, thanks to @digger@lemmy.ca for pointing out my typos. I have fixed them now.

        • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well now, that would’ve saved me a lot of time and research. I also wouldn’t have learned nearly as much from reading all the different privacy policies. Luckily, I didn’t do that which allowed me to create my own personal recommendations for my family and myself.

    • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I want to reiterate that I have no affiliation with Kagi or any other search engine, I currently don’t even pay for Kagi. I am just a human on the hunt for the best search engine to protect my family’s privacy.

      That said, I just saw your update regarding Sentry.

      Looking at Kagi’s Privacy Policy, there are two things to say in response to

      It states that Kaji is the best when actually they are clearly the worst, they do record your IP to deliver their services and they do share your data with a notorious 3rd party tracking company- sentry.io.

      “We do not log or store your IP address. Your IP address is used only temporarily when enriching location/maps searches, and is not shared with any other party.”

      “Anonymous logs are shared with Sentry when bugs, crashes, or warnings occur for debugging purposes.”

      Also:

      If you pay them then everything you do on their site is linked directly do you. I.e. zero privacy.

      “Searches are anonymous and private to you. Kagi does not log and associate searches with an account.”

  • kraniax@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is clearly biased. Your points against SearXNG are weak. And you purposefully ignore the huge privacy implications of needing an account to do searches.

    I don’t think this is written by a bot, but I’d say it’s either a camouflaged ad or a rather biased article.

    Edit: To be clear. I do not care that a certain company has a good privacy policy. I want verifiable facts, not unverifiable claims. Their backend is proprietary, while SearXNG is free software. There’s only one entity behind that company, which could be (or turn) malicious at any moment. Meanwhile, SearXNG is hosted by multiple individuals and organizations, you could even use a different instance each time, so it’s impossible to corelate your search queries.

    So yeah, this is a rather biased article towards a certain company.

    • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for your feedback. My goal was just to look through the privacy policies with this, but you bring up a good point that that might not be a good experiment and could less to false assumptions. I do wonder if Kagi has had any this party analysis to back up their claims since it is not OSS.