• Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that they have it on this blatant of a propaganda poster means that unions work.

    And going through union for what you need is much more effective and quicker than letting a supervisor/manager drag their feet and kick the ball around, and that’s what makes union dues worth it.

    • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s because the manager is incentivized to not help you, while the union is incentivized to help you.

      Unions are game-theoretically necessary.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        If employers have organizations advocating for them, it only makes sense for employees to have the same

    • Pipoca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fact that they have it on this blatant of a propaganda poster means that unions work.

      Not necessarily.

      A poster this blatant means unions are bad for management.

      It doesn’t prove that unions aren’t bad for both workers and management alike. Business isn’t a zero sum game. To show that something helps workers, you need to demonstrate that it helps workers.

      Which is to say, this poster is a bad argument for unions. The success of the writers strike, on the other hand, is a good argument of how unions protect workers from the bad deals management offers.