The Hamas-run Health Ministry in the Gaza Strip says at least 500 people have been killed in an explosion that it says was caused by an Israeli airstrike.
Updated: Israel denies involvement in deadly Gaza hospital blast, says explosion caused by Islamic Jihad
Thus far your contributions to this “debate” have been “that’s bs”, “gimme source”, “i don’t like your source”, and “you’re arguing wrong”.
You’re just being a shit-stirrer right now. Are you seriously going to pretend you’ve been having a rational discussion this whole time? If the only acceptable endgame for you is the other person blindly accepting your contrary viewpoint, with NO sources might I add, then you’re arguing in bad faith.
That’s not a debate, at best it’s a pisspoor attempt at a lecture.
edit: cool job ninja editing your comments to make you look slightly less bad.
edit: cool job ninja editing your comments to make you look slightly less bad.
Not choosing sides in your argument, but just saying, that’s why you always quote what you’re replying to, to protect your reply from future edits of the original comment.
What do you expect? I get one toe into a discussion and get unjustly lambasted with names and labels. You went through my comment history, from other interactions, to assemble what you think was a complete debate. You’re scraping the barrel and you’re a malicious coward if you want to get into name-calling.
Address the precision of the strike. Address vaguery of Biden’s affirmation. Address the context of the IJ call. Can you? Or do you attack the debater themselves, you ad-hominem prone dunce?
Edit: I can’t even recall what I edited. You can repost it if you like, since you’re grasping at straws.
I get such a kick out of people blocking people on here because they don’t like what they have to say.
“Hello, stranger. I know that the odds that I’ll ever encounter you again and realize that it’s you I’m encountering are slim to none, but I’m going to block you. Does that hurt your feelings?”
I’d rather have no content than have to read the posts of the same troll over and over again
That’s a not-logical absoluteum type of reply. Without any content you wouldn’t be here to block people.
At some point you need to open your mind to alternate opinions.
You don’t have to like them, and yes, you can challenge them, but try to stick your head in the ground to ignore them will just end with you being ignorant and alone.
You’re incapable of participating in a debate. Destroy Hamas. Do it. Just no war crimes. End of story.
You’re refusing to debate in good faith. It just screams “bad actor”, but please do continue to spout your rhetoric.
The irony of your comment, dude. Yikes. Let’s talk about the issue without name-calling or labels.
Thus far your contributions to this “debate” have been “that’s bs”, “gimme source”, “i don’t like your source”, and “you’re arguing wrong”.
You’re just being a shit-stirrer right now. Are you seriously going to pretend you’ve been having a rational discussion this whole time? If the only acceptable endgame for you is the other person blindly accepting your contrary viewpoint, with NO sources might I add, then you’re arguing in bad faith.
That’s not a debate, at best it’s a pisspoor attempt at a lecture.
edit: cool job ninja editing your comments to make you look slightly less bad.
Not choosing sides in your argument, but just saying, that’s why you always quote what you’re replying to, to protect your reply from future edits of the original comment.
What do you expect? I get one toe into a discussion and get unjustly lambasted with names and labels. You went through my comment history, from other interactions, to assemble what you think was a complete debate. You’re scraping the barrel and you’re a malicious coward if you want to get into name-calling.
Address the precision of the strike. Address vaguery of Biden’s affirmation. Address the context of the IJ call. Can you? Or do you attack the debater themselves, you ad-hominem prone dunce?
Edit: I can’t even recall what I edited. You can repost it if you like, since you’re grasping at straws.
Blocking you for defending Hamas terrorists
Removed by mod
I get such a kick out of people blocking people on here because they don’t like what they have to say.
“Hello, stranger. I know that the odds that I’ll ever encounter you again and realize that it’s you I’m encountering are slim to none, but I’m going to block you. Does that hurt your feelings?”
What’s the fucking point? Seriously.
Just saying, Lemmy’s userbase isn’t that big, so the odds of encountering the same user again, especially in a given community, are fairly high
And by blocking in such a small user base you really cut back on the content you have available to yourself here on Lemmy.
I’d rather have no content than have to read the posts of the same troll over and over again
That’s a not-logical absoluteum type of reply. Without any content you wouldn’t be here to block people.
At some point you need to open your mind to alternate opinions.
You don’t have to like them, and yes, you can challenge them, but try to stick your head in the ground to ignore them will just end with you being ignorant and alone.
Don’t imprison yourself.
Some people can’t handle existing outside of their bubble.
The irony is that if they listen to opinions that are contrary to their own it may expand their bubble and allow them to escape it.