Air is better than water

  • zurohki@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s definitely easier, simpler and cheaper.

    Water cooling can be quieter, though. Some big radiators and you can cool a gaming PC with hardly any airflow.

    • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, it’s the GPU fans that are the real noisy ones. I can tolerate a noctua CPU cooler but GPU’s are like jet engines under load.

      • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use a PowerEdge T620 as my daily driver, let me assure you the CPU fans at full speed can be heard clearly through 3 closed doors :P

        • the_third@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Server hardware with their 15000rpm fans will do that. We have a customer specializing in GPU intensive number crunching. They have little storage cupboards accessible from the hallway for every two person office. Their workstations sit there and the cables go through the wall to the desks.

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it depends on the use case. Personally, I simply don’t jive with the idea of conductive liquids swirling inside my expensive PC.

    • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re supposed to use distilled water which is not conductive. At least that used to be the case last I saw liquid cooling.

      In the end it’s simply not worth it for me. You still need to radiate the heat out, which usually means a big fan, which most air coolers nowadays have anyways.

      • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Liquid coolers are by definition just an extra heat exchange step unless you’re venting heat into the ocean or something like a nuclear plant. Otherwise, the atmosphere is your final heat sink either way.

        Unless a liquid cooling radiator is significantly larger than the air cooler that would fit directly on the CPU there’s no point whatsoever.

        • _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          there’s no point whatsoever

          I’ve been building my own PCs for a looong time, and I’ve been skeptical of using water cooling in any of my machines.

          This changed recently for me, when I got my first 4000 series nvidia gpu, that fucker is huge! And it runs hot, spewing all of its heat directly into the middle of the case. I had serious concerns with this gpu + massive cpu air cooler getting in the way of positive airflow through my case.

          And this is where water cooling made perfect sense to me: transport the heat away from the cpu, thus clearing a ton of space from the middle of the case, then have a radiator at the top of the case dissipate that cpu heat.

          This allows for a ton of air to go through my case, evacuating all of that heat blowing out of the gpu. This also allows for other heat sinks on the mobo and other components to passively cool better

        • Tak@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree with you in most cases.

          There is a point though as a water cooler can cool an extremely small area better than heatpipes. Look at Zen 4 processors for instance. The CCD is so small and offset that many air coolers don’t properly line the heat pipes with part of the CPU making the most heat. Because of this Noctua even makes and sells an offset bracket to try and move the heatpipes over the CCD. Meanwhile a waterblock should cool the entire area at effectively the same rate as it doesn’t rely on vaporizing the coolant and condensing but just pushing coolant through regardless of heat saturation.

          Only a fraction of people should really notice that like overclockers and generally people buy coolers they don’t need.

      • ornery_chemist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think water is rather rare as a coolant these days. Organics (chemical sense not farming sense) like propylene glycol or some kind of glyme aren’t potentially corrosive to metals if spilled, are harder to grow shit in, have lower volatility, and have a higher thermal limit. Maybe also with a little bit of antifouling agent thrown in. My main gripe with them is that if you do spill them, they don’t evaporate and you’re slipping over the floor for the next few days because you missed a spot.

        But yeah, air cooling ftw

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s simple for me. Points of failures of air cooling: fans. Failure states: fan fails, system heat protection kicks in and shuts down.

      Water cooling? Points of failure: fans, pumps, tubbings, fittings. Failure states: fan fails (best case), worst case? Liquid goes over electronics while they are powered.

  • Voyajer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember kids, if you’re ever feeling useless, you’ll always be more useful than a 120mm AIO.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a fun thing to do. I like my setup (O11 dynamic XL, two 360mm rads, dual pumps, both CPU and GPU blocks), but I wouldn’t necessarily recommend it to anyone. It’s a lot of effort and expense for a little gain. But it’s a hobby on top of a hobby, and that’s fine if you want to go for it.

    • Ovent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’m CPU/GPU cooled for a good while now (4-5y). It’s a lot of efforts and make it harder to upgrade. You gain a bit of silence, but it’s really not worth for most people. Like you said, it’s more of a hobbit than anything.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, upgrading is definitely a pain and more costly. Redoing the tubes if you went with hard tubing is part of it. If you didn’t go with some generic waterblocks you’re stuck with them fitted to the motherboard and good luck reassembling the fan cooler on the gpu if you kept the 50 small screws that held it all together.

        That said, I personally won’t go back to air cooled. The low noise and steady temperature are worth it IMO.

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      I once had a PC with watercooling. It died because I was drinking with a friend and wanted to show it off. So I removed the sidepanel and my drunken self tipped the beer bottle which promptly spilled over the running mainboard. Welp, it was some form of water that killed my PC I guess.

  • 0x4E4F@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not necessarily, but one, it’s a lot cheaper, two, air leaks are not a problem.

    • KrokanteBamischijf@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, this is the best argument in favor of air cooling. Air cooling has less points of failure.

      With water cooling there’s tons of potential problems that “haha wind go brrrr cooling” just doesn’t produce: Water block gummed up with mold? Take a performance hit. Pump dead? Sucks to be you. Leak in the system? Enjoy replacing your motherboard.

      Main issue you might encounter in air cooling is just “fan died, replace fan”. (Obviously not counting thermal interface materials since they are required for both cooling solutions)

      • 0x4E4F@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Air cooling has less points of failure.

        One of the main reasons why brand name workstations and servers are still air cooled… and will probably be for a very long time.

        • pedz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are some data centers that are water cooled though. I know OVH uses water cooling for some of its servers, and also seems to be developing immersion cooling.

  • PunnyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Technically, no, air is a much worse thermal conductor, and most liquids are significantly better. It’s a pretty efficient thermal INSULATOR, however.

    The practical applications, however, make the movement of air OUT of your system an efficient cooling method.

    • somtwo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not trying to be contrarian or a smart-ass, but aren’t water cooled systems kinda just air cooled systems with the radiator moved elsewhere?

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. The advantage is that you can make the surface area of the air cooling part much, much larger. I had a water cooled system that could do web browsing and other basic tasks with zero fan speed (though it was better to leave it on very low speed to avoid hunting behavior).

        Also, there’s some benefits to thermal mass. Short term spikes can be absorbed by the water without increasing fan speed.

        • crystal@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I had a water cooled system that could do web browsing and other basic tasks with zero fan speed

          Isn’t that the default for (air cooled) notebooks?

      • tryptaminev@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every liquid cooling system is pretty much that. Eventually you need to give it to the outside and the outside is usually air. Heck even river cooling for Power plants ends up “air cooling” through the rivers surface.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that the point is to get a much bigger radiator by moving it to a less cramped location. The point is to make the process more efficient, not to change its nature.

      • the_third@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not if you use water from the tap. A friend of mine in college did that when he had a water flatrate in his appartment. Worked pretty well.

          • the_third@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            Deutsch
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah, not everywhere. Our village has no water meters because, why. Spring water from the mountains is not treated, only monitored for microorganisms and contaminants and fed into our water supply by gravity. Doesn’t really matter if it runs through a computer on its way to the sea or not.

            In places like big cities or flat plains where the water needs to be pumped and treated that’s a different thing.

    • yesmeisyes@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Usually copper heatpipes that are found in most air coolers have a drop of liquid in them to boost perfomance.

  • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Molten Salt cooling. That can handle CPU temperatures of several million degrees. Your CPU may not handle that, but that’s not my problem.

  • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A big ass CPU heat sync and fan like that is usually at least as good as most water cooling options. Often times it scores higher on performance tests. It depends on your exact hardware of course.

    • ArianaGrande@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a huge fuckin Noctua fan like that, and it’s the most silent shit I’ve ever had in a computer. I don’t even understand how they achieved that.

      • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just a high quality fan I guess. If they’re good they can be really really quiet. If they use brushless motors that can be almost completely silent.

  • BonfireOvDreams@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Quieter, less point’s of failure, and in many cases taking up less space. I have compressed air for dust. In the consumer sphere and almost any enthusiast sphere, air cooling > > > water cooling

  • shiveyarbles@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes thank you. I went through a water cooling phase, what a pain in the ass. Worrying about the pump, algae, topping off reservoir, leaks ruining your motherboard. The concept is nice, but the reality is high fucking maintenance for no added value.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The noctua air coolers work so well. As long as you don’t care about the station wagon color scheme I think it’s the best cooler for that price range by a large margin.