• foonex@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 years ago

    I don‘t understand why this is upvoted. It‘s pretty clear from the start that the author is not interested in constructive criticism. I don‘t have any stake in ActivityPub, and not really an opinion whether it is a good or a bad protocol. But this article is just an angry rant, and a complete waste of time.

    • Liwott@nerdica.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      The tone of the article is really unpleasant, and its conclusions appear too bitter and vague to be really trusted, but at least it addresses specific points who fueled interesting discussions in this comment section.

      I upvoted the post, not becuse I agree with the content of the article, but because of its potential for interesting discussions, that makes it a good addition to this community.

      • foonex@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        Sadly, I had not read the comments from @rysiek@szmer.info because szmer.info is blocked on feddit.de for whatever reason. The detailed rebuttal from @rysiek@szmer.info indeed makes this thread worthwhile, and I would love if I could upvote that comment.