• Chobbes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    What counts as retro these days anyway? It still kind of blows my mind that some people consider the PS3 / 360 retro now.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can understand the PS360 argument. It was probably the last generation where most games were actually playable off the disc without a bunch of patches.

      With how common DLC and stuff was becoming that generation, though, I feel like it’s sort of a soft boundary for retro. I can equally accept retro being anything before the PS360, or before/including that generation.

      I don’t look forward to the days where “retro gaming” refers to “any console with physical releases at all”.

    • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean it makes sense, I remember around 2006 everyone referred to the SNES as “retro” and no one questioned it. That’s a smaller time gap than 360 era to now.

      • Chobbes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        For sure, though I think a couple of things make it weird to me. Games changed a lot more in that early period, I think. Plus a lot of games in the PS3 / 360 era seem to just get rereleased slightly differently every few years which kind of makes it seem like we never left that generation.